Robin Kay Lord, Out of the 'Trenches,' Breaks Ground for Same-Sex Couples in 2018 Appeal
"It's an entirely different animal in the Appellate Division," Lord said. "When I'm up there I sort of feel like a fish out of water sometimes. ... Usually I'm in the trenches."
June 07, 2019 at 03:00 PM
5 minute read
Robin Kay Lord of Trenton is known for her accomplishments as a criminal defense trial attorney, but she also represented the plaintiffs in Moreland v. Parks, which in 2018 yielded an Appellate Division ruling that recognized a same-sex spouse's right to pursue a Portee claim.
“The Morelands came to us 10 years ago,” Lord said in an interview. “It was a horrific case.”
Indeed it was, involving the death of 2-year-old I'Maya Moreland of Trenton. The girl was the biological daughter of plaintiff I'Asia Moreland, who lived with fellow plaintiff Valeria Benning as a married couple in a household that included l'Maya. The Jan. 30, 2009, accident happened as Moreland, Benning, l'Maya, sibling I'Zhir Moreland and stepson Armanti Martinez were waiting to cross Route 129 in Trenton to get to the Sun Bank Arts Center. Benning was holding I'Maya Moreland's hand when a city firetruck collided with a pickup truck, which struck Moreland, propelling her 65 feet from the accident site. She died as the result of her injuries.
Mercer County Superior Court Judge William Anklowitz, granting summary judgment, said Benning had not developed a sufficient emotional and familial relationship with I'Maya to support a claim under Portee v. Jaffe, a 1980 Supreme Court ruling which allows recovery for bystander negligent infliction of emotional distress for family members.
“When we did summary judgment, there were so many issues before the trial court,” Lord said, and when the court ruled on the Portee issue, “I thought I was in an alternate universe, I didn't believe it,” she said.
During the January 2018 arguments, the Appellate Division asked why the record was sparse on evidence demonstrating family ties between Benning and l'Maya, Lord recalled.
“I said, because it was obvious” that they were part of a family, having lived together for years, and Benning being known as “mom” to the children, she said.
The court, led by Appellate Division Judge Jose Fuentes in August 2018 reversed, noting that same-sex couples weren't recognized when Portee came down decades ago, but, “the overwhelming number of our fellow citizens now unequivocally reject this shameful, morally untenable bigotry; our laws, both legislatively and through judicial decisions, now recognize and protect the rights of LGBTQ people to equal dignity and treatment under law.”
“A rational jury can find that Benning was a de facto mother to the child, and felt her loss as deeply as any parent facing that horrific event,” Fuentes wrote, joined by Judges Thomas Manahan and Karen Suter.
The case is ongoing, as the plaintiffs settled with the city of Trenton, and dismissal of claims against other defendants were appealed, Lord said.
Lord does 90 percent criminal work, so Moreland was something of a special case for her.
And while Lord does have plenty of experience with appellate arguments—including in State v. Mercedes, which she argued before the state Supreme Court, and which in 2018 garnered a decision holding that “a recommendation against a defendant's pretrial release that is based only on the type of offense charged cannot justify detention by itself unless the recommendation is based on one of two presumptions in the statute”—appeals are not the typical fare for her.
“It's an entirely different animal in the Appellate Division,” said Lord, who acknowledged being “nervous every time” she argues a case on appeal. “When I'm up there, I sort of feel like a fish out of water sometimes. … Usually I'm in the trenches.”
She was in the trenches in October 2018 when she obtained a trial acquittal of Mario Flores, who was charged in the shooting death of his wife. The evidence pointed to the death being a suicide, she said.
“If you think your client is truly, truly, truly innocent, the pressure is tremendous,” Lord said of that case.
The civil work she does is typically in civil rights litigation against the city and city police on behalf of arrestees, though earlier this year she obtained an $850,000 settlement on behalf of the family of a motorcyclist, Julius Thomas, killed in a crash along what was alleged to be a dangerous stretch of road in the city.
As a known entity in Trenton, various types of cases—not just the criminal cases on which she built her career—make their way to her, said Lord, a former longtime assistant public defender who launched her own practice in 1996.
“I was fortunate enough to land in Trenton in the 80s,” when newspaper competition was particularly intense and she made a name for herself appearing in the news. “When something horrific happens, I'm one of the people they call.”
Even horrific cases, though, can yield positive results. Lord said she's pleased that the Appellate Division's decision in Moreland was heralded by so many.
“I was delighted to know how much attention in received,” Lord said. “Hopefully it will help.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFor Lawyers, the 'Work' of Making an Impact Does Not Have to Happen in a Courtroom. Laura E. Sedlak Says
Doing the Right Thing in the Pursuit of Justice Requires Guts, Says Lyndsay Ruotolo
One Can be Most Impactful When Their Pursuits Are Driven by Their Concerns and Passions, Says Sherilyn Pastor
As a Lawyer, You Have a Powerful Way to Make an Impact, Says Mary Frances Palisano
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250