John Keefe Sr. on Professionalism in Law: 'Leaders of Law Firms Have Some Work to Do'
"Litigation should not be a blood sport. It is certainly not taught that way in law schools."
June 10, 2019 at 06:16 PM
4 minute read
During a 54-year legal career (which of course is ongoing) John Keefe Sr. has achieved excellence in several quarters, perhaps most notably his 13-year tenure on the Appellate Division, where he penned some 150 opinions per year, according to a colleague, and ultimately achieved the rank of presiding judge. He retired from the bench in 2001. Keefe began his career as a civil trial attorney and joined the bench in 1977, and came to be lead judge in New Jersey-based asbestos litigation. Keefe, now in alternative dispute resolution practice at the Keefe Law Firm in Red Bank, also is a teacher, lecturer, author, mentor and volunteer.
Objectively, what key moments or accomplishments have defined your career?
I had the good fortune of beginning my career with three brilliant lawyers who taught me how to work hard, do my job ethically on behalf of a client, and, at the same time, develop a professional relationship with my adversaries. I was also fortunate to have an understanding wife who supported my decision to leave a successful practice and become a judge at a fairly young age. That support and the mentoring of many senior judges along the way allowed me to experience a rewarding 25-year career that ended in the Appellate Division. That broad-based judicial career has certainly helped in my current ADR practice.
Subjectively, what are your proudest or most personally satisfying achievements?
I had the privilege of mentoring 32 law clerks over the years in the ins and outs of everyday litigation and professional responsibility. I have enjoyed observing their success. I have also had the pleasure to mentor my son, who is now the [immediate past] president of the New Jersey State Bar Association. I am proud of his accomplishments as a lawyer, and as a person. He has also given me a place to work in my retirement from the bench.
How is success best achieved and sustained?
Success is best achieved through hard work, nights and weekends included as necessary. Family always comes first, but the conflict between profession and family can be managed through efficient use of time. Development of professional relationships is also very important. Some old sayings are worth keeping in mind: “Don't burn bridges;” “What goes around comes around;” “Listen, think, speak.” Most lawyers would prefer to do their jobs without contentiousness.
How are the business and profession of law changing, and are New Jersey lawyers well positioned for the future?
I have had experiences with hundreds of lawyers in New Jersey and elsewhere. New Jersey lawyers are certainly as good as any. Unfortunately, I see a difference in how lawyers treat each other. It may be a function of the practice becoming regional, national, or the sheer number of lawyers who do not know each other. None of those reasons is a good excuse for abrasive behavior. Litigation should not be a blood sport. It is certainly not taught that way in law schools, so I believe it is something acquired in practice. Leaders of law firms have some work to do.
What advice would you give to someone contemplating a career in law, or someone whose career in law has not been satisfying so far?
As to those who are contemplating law as a career, I suggest they attempt to obtain internships during college to understand what happens in a firm on a day-to-day basis, if time and money allows. It will help them appreciate that TV is not the real world, and what they learn in law school is just the beginning of the journey.
The second question is far too complicated to answer briefly. As my contracts professor would say when someone gave an unacceptable answer to a question: “Don't worry, the world also needs shoemakers.” On a more serious note, I am a firm believer that a law degree is a valuable asset even if a person does not like the traditional practice of law. The analytical approach to issue resolution is transferable to other occupations that are law-related or business-related. I would encourage that person to think positively about the future. There are professionals out there who can give assistance in these circumstances.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 2GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 3Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
- 4Warner Bros. Accused of Misleading Investors on NBA Talks
- 5FTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250