Budd Larner Announces July Closure
"We are sad to announce that after 85 years of servicing clients and contributing towards shaping New Jersey's legal landscape, Budd Larner will be ceasing operations in July," the firm's leaders said.
June 14, 2019 at 06:24 PM
4 minute read
New Jersey law firm Budd Larner, whose future became uncertain earlier this year amid mounting departures, has confirmed it will close its doors in July.
Executive committee members Peter Frazza and Susan Winters communicated the plans in an email Friday to the Law Journal.
“We are sad to announce that after 85 years of servicing clients and contributing towards shaping New Jersey's legal landscape, Budd Larner will be ceasing operations in July. Many great relationships were forged by our attorneys and staff while at Budd Larner which we look forward to maintaining in the future,” their statement said.
They said they would not comment further.
The Law Journal previously reported that the firm was expected to close this summer.
Michael Sirota of Cole Schotz in Hackensack is representing Budd Larner, he previously told the Law Journal. Sirota, co-chair of his firm's bankruptcy and corporate restructuring department, couldn't immediately be reached by phone or email Friday.
Frazza and Winters are Budd Larner's two remaining members of what had been a five-person executive committee. Two other members, Andrew Miller and James Fitzsimmons, departed in April—in Miller's case, with a group of 15 lawyers from his intellectual property practice, which he brought to the Madison office of Windels Marx Lane & Mittendorf. The fifth member, Joseph Schiavone, brought his seven-lawyer insurance practice to Saiber in September 2018.
More recently, on May 1, Joshua Weiner, who had spent three years at Budd Larner and chaired the employment and labor law practice group at the firm, went to Coughlin Duffy in Morristown. He joined as a partner and was tasked with launching an employment and labor practice group at Coughlin Duffy. His father, Paul Weiner, joined him, coming to Coughlin Duffy as special counsel.
Joshua Weiner, reached by phone Friday, said he began looking to move his practice a few months before the April departures.
“I kind of saw where things were headed,” said Weiner, who is the last known lateral partner to have joined Budd Larner. He joined the firm in May 2016 after a brief time with Hill Wallack and about seven years with Weiner & Weiner. “In order to ensure that I could grow my practice, I thought it was the best [decision] for me and my clients.
“It was just unfortunate how the firm was managed … which was more as several different firms rather than one firm,” Weiner said of Budd Larner, noting what he saw as a lack of a succession plan. “That's not a recipe for continued longevity for the firm.”
(Frazza and Winters didn't respond to an email seeking comment on Weiner's statements about Budd Larner's management.)
At Coughlin Duffy, Weiner hopes to grow the labor and employment practice and presently is getting assistance from some firm attorneys who do such work as part of their practice, he said, noting that he represents small and midsize businesses in various industries—clients that came over in his move to the new firm.
Weiner called Budd Larner's impending closure “extremely unfortunate” and said the quality of the legal work at the firm had always been high in his experience.
“It was a good firm,” Weiner said. “It was a good group of lawyers there.”
The firm that would become known simply as Budd Larner in recent years started in 1934 as a small firm in Newark and grew to roughly 110 lawyers in the 1980s, though its head count would fluctuate over the years with rounds of defections and new hires. Budd Larner had as many as 75 lawyers about four years ago. The firm's website listed 28 lawyers as of Friday.
The firm transformed from an insurance defense firm to one offering a range of services, and came to be fueled by a national mass toxic tort litigation practice. Budd Larner became known for its involvement representing plaintiffs in the 1980s and 1990s in civil litigation against tobacco companies over their products' link to cancer in users.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFor Lawyers, the 'Work' of Making an Impact Does Not Have to Happen in a Courtroom. Laura E. Sedlak Says
Doing the Right Thing in the Pursuit of Justice Requires Guts, Says Lyndsay Ruotolo
One Can be Most Impactful When Their Pursuits Are Driven by Their Concerns and Passions, Says Sherilyn Pastor
As a Lawyer, You Have a Powerful Way to Make an Impact, Says Mary Frances Palisano
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250