BAR REPORT - Laws on service, emotional support animals, growing but much still uncharted: Issues explored at innovative NJICLE seminar
NJICLE seminar focuses on service and support animals
June 17, 2019 at 11:45 AM
5 minute read
C.P. McKenna knows firsthand about the growing problem of fraudulent service animals. His guide dog, Finn, has been attacked six times in 21/2 years, many of them from untrained and out-of-control dogs whose owners tried to pass them off as service animals.
Fortunately, Finn sustained only minor injuries and was able to continue working. McKenna said it is often the case that a service dog has to be retired after it is attacked, even if it only suffers minor injuries, because in the future it may exhibit fear around other dogs, putting its owner in jeopardy.
Fraudulent service animals hurt those who need legitimate service animals to assist them with a disability, said McKenna, a blind attorney who works as director of employment services at Family Resource Network in New Brunswick.
McKenna was among the panelists who spoke at the recent Service Animals and the Law Seminar sponsored by the New Jersey Institute of Continuing Legal Education (NJICLE), the educational arm of the New Jersey State Bar Association.
The panelists covered different aspects of service and assistance animal law, including state and federal laws, such as the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), the Fair Housing Act (FHA) and the Air Carrier Access Act.
Twenty-eight states have passed laws on fraudulent service animals that carry penalties such as jail, fines or community service. A variety of proposed bills are under consideration this year in seven states, McKenna said. He hailed New Jersey's 2014 passage of Dusty's Law, which makes an attack on a service animal a crime and triggers an immediate response from law enforcement.
ID debate
McKenna said a contentious issue under debate in the blind and visually impaired community is whether identification cards should be required to prove that an animal is a legitimate service animal.
Under the ADA, individuals cannot be asked to show such proof, but a business is allowed to ask an individual if the animal is required because of a disability and what task or work the animal has been trained to do.
The ADA defines a service animal as an animal that has been trained to perform a particular task for the benefit of an individual with a disability. Those tasks can include pulling a wheelchair, retrieving an object or medication, alerting an individual of an oncoming seizure or serving as a guide to someone who is blind or vision impaired. The ADA recognizes only dogs and miniature horses as service animals.
Service, emotional and therapy animals
The public often confuses an emotional support or therapy animal with a service animal, but they are not the same thing, said A.J. Albrecht, an attorney with Best Friends Animal Society in Maplewood, who was on the panel. The key difference is the training, McKenna said.
The benefit of an emotional support or therapy animal is derived from their presence, as opposed to a task they have been trained to provide. Albrecht takes her therapy dog to schools, nursing homes and hospitals.
Beth C. Manes, of Manes & Weinberg in Springfield, and a former chair of the NJSBA's Solo and Small-Firm Section, said service animals are covered under the ADA, while emotional support animals are covered under the FHA.
“If a person can establish a need for an emotional support animal, the landlord has to make reasonable accommodations,” Manes said.
Fraudulent emotional support animals seem to be more of a problem than fraudulent service animals, especially in housing, she said.
Incidents involving the use of emotional support animals, both those recommended by a doctor or licensed mental health professional and self-proclaimed by owners, have received widespread media attention in recent years. United Airlines refused to allow a woman from bringing her emotional support peacock on board a flight departing Newark Liberty International Airport last year. And in May, an Alabama man filed a negligence lawsuit against Delta Air Lines and a fellow passenger after he was attacked on a plane by an emotional support dog.
“You can't take your Shih Tzu, throw a vest on it and now all of a sudden it's a guide dog,” she said.
***
NJICLE is the state's leading provider of continuing legal education and holds hundreds of programs around the state throughout the year on cutting-edge topics. Upcoming programming includes looking at mental health issues, drone law, and updates on the state's laws related to cannabis. On Monday, the institute will celebrate volunteers who have contributed to the rich cannon of programming offered to New Jersey's attorneys. To find out about that celebration, or to learn more about NJICLE's upcoming programming, visit njicle.com.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
Trending Stories
- 1Delaware Court Holds Stance on Musk's $55.8B Pay Rescission, Awards Shareholder Counsel $345M
- 2'Go 12 Rounds' or Settle: Rear-End Collision Leads to $2.25M Presuit Settlement
- 32 Federal Judges Rescind Senior Status After Trump Win. Might More Follow?
- 4Japan Highlights Burr & Forman Director's 'Body Of Work' With Highest Honor
- 5Unanswered Questions on Remote Work Complicate NJ Wage Transparency Law, Litigators Say
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250