NJ High School Wrestler's Dreadlock Shaving Prompts Bill to Ban Discrimination Based on Hair
The legislation, inspired by the nationally reported case of a high school wrestler forced into an on-the-spot decision to either shave his dreadlocks or forfeit a match, would prohibit hair discrimination in the workplace, housing and schools.
June 18, 2019 at 11:07 AM
5 minute read
Gender, race and religion are protected under federal and state laws barring discrimination. What about one's hair?
Employers and school administrators in New Jersey may have another factor to steer clear from, or adjust their grooming policies toward, when making hiring decisions.
Legislation that would prohibit discrimination on the basis of hair style, type, or texture under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD) was introduced in the state Assembly and Senate on June 13. Advocates say it reflects another development in civil rights law.
The legislation, inspired by the nationally reported case of an Atlantic County high school wrestler forced into an on-the-spot decision to either shave his dreadlocks or forfeit a match, would prohibit hair discrimination in the workplace, housing and schools.
Primary sponsors Assemblywoman Angela McKnight, D-Hudson, Assemblywoman Verlina Reynolds-Jackson, D-Mercer, and Assemblywoman Shanique Speight, D-Essex, introduced A-5564 on June 13.
In the upper chamber, Sens. Sandra Bolden Cunningham, D-Hudson, Nia Gill, D-Essex, and Shirley Turner, D-Mercer, introduced an identical bill the same day.
Each was referred to its chamber's labor committee and is awaiting a hearing.
Specifically, the measures would amend the LAD so that the term “race” encompasses “traits historically associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture, hair type, and protective hairstyles.” Under the bill, the term “protective hair styles” includes, but is not limited to, braids, locks, and twists. It also includes Afros.
Turner said what prompted her sponsoring the bill was the case of Buena Regional High School junior Andrew Johnson, who became nationally known when he was captured on video having his dreadlocks shaved off during a December 2018 wrestling meet. Referee Alan Maloney, citing high school wrestling rules, had required Johnson to either shave off the dreadlocks or forfeit the match.
Turner noted that the referee gave the young man 90 seconds to make a decision. The young man won the match but had his hair cut in the gymnasium and was publicly humiliated just so he could participate, she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Year of Controversy: NJ Judges Face Disciplinary and Legal Issues With Mixed Results in 2024
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pardoning Jan. 6 Defendants May Send Bad Message About Insurrection, Rule of Law
- 2Looming Clash Over Abortion Pills Shows Overturning 'Roe v. Wade' Settled Nothing
- 33rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
- 4Latest Class of Court Officers Sworn into Service in New York
- 5Kirkland's Daniel Lavon-Krein: Staying Ahead of Private Equity Consolidation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250