Westminster Sale Called Off, but Litigation Against Rider Continues
Rider's latest plan for Westminster Choir College, announced Monday, calls for its graduate and undergraduate music programs to relocate from their longtime location in Princeton to Rider's campus in Lawrenceville.
July 02, 2019 at 03:53 PM
4 minute read
A legal battle over the future of Westminster Choir College shows no signs of subsiding, even after Rider University's announcement that a controversial $40 million deal to sell the school to a buyer from China has fallen through.
Rider's latest plan for Westminster Choir College, announced Monday, calls for its graduate and undergraduate music programs to relocate from their longtime location in Princeton to Rider's campus in Lawrenceville. Rider's announcement is vague about the future of Westminster's 23-acre campus in Princeton but suggests it will “explore the possibility of retaining a footprint” there.
“Throughout this process, we have continually sought to preserve and enhance Westminster's legacy as a world-class institution, and we made every effort to maintain the college in Princeton,” Rider president Gregory Dell'Omo said in a statement.
However, even partnering with a well-intentioned outside entity such as Beijing Kaiwen Education Technology Co. Ltd, which had agreed to purchase and operate the college, was not feasible on a viable timeline, Dell'Omo said.
But a lawyer who represents plaintiffs in a suit against Rider says relocating Westminster away from its Princeton campus would violate conditions of a trust established by philanthropist Sophia Strong Taylor when she donated land for the Westminster campus in the 1930s. The plaintiffs, a group of graduates, faculty, students and parents, are seeking to enforce terms of a trust established by Taylor, who called for the land to revert to ownership of Princeton Theological Seminary if Westminster ceased to use it for a music school. The suit is pending in Mercer County Superior Court.
“By saying it wants to close the campus, Rider is effectively abandoning the responsibility it took over as charitable steward of the property,” says Bruce Afran, the Princeton solo practitioner who represents the alumni, faculty and students who are suing Rider.
In addition, the plaintiffs expect to amend their complaint against Rider in the near future to seek a severing of Westminster from Rider, Afran said. Such an action is warranted because Rider has breached its duties as a charitable steward of Westminster. Enrollment at Westminster has dropped by more than half since Rider announced plans to sell it to a Chinese buyer two years ago, said Afran.
Westminster was founded in 1920, and it operated in various locations before moving to its present campus in 1934. It offers programs in music education, voice performance, piano performance, organ performance, pedagogy, music theory and composition, conducting, sacred music and arts management. It remained independent until 1991, when it affiliated with Rider.
Plans for two schools came full-circle this week, as the proposal to move Westminster's music programs to the Rider campus were first proposed in 2017. Rider then reached an agreement with Beijing Kaiwen, which agreed to operate Westminster at the Princeton location for at least 10 years.
But demands from the state Attorney General's Office for information about its operations, finances and staffing may have given Beijing Kaiwen cold feet about the deal, according to Afran, who said the would-be buyer is affliliated with the Chinese government.
A representative of the Attorney General's Office, which has been asked to issue an opinion on whether Rider's management of the Westminster property fulfills its obligations under the charitable trust, told Superior Court Judge Paul Innes on June 25 that it could not provide an opinion unless it receives information it sought from Beijing Kaiwen, says Afran.
Beijing Kaiwen's lawyer in the case, Kevin Hart of Stark & Stark in Lawrenceville, declined to comment on his client's reason for withdrawing from the Westminster Choir College deal.
A Rider University spokeswoman did not respond to questions about the latest developments concerning the Westminster issue.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Division Tosses Challenge to Rutgers Board Members That Ensnared NJ Lawyer
5 minute readSeton Hall Escapes COVID-19 Wrongful Death Suit After Student Found Dead in Dorm
4 minute readWhere CFPB Enforcement Stops Short on Curbing School Lunch Fees, Class Action Complaint Steps Up
5 minute readFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 2Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 3Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 4Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
- 5Zoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250