NJ Summer Associate Programs Steady in Scale, But Evolution Continues
The hiring of summer associates at New Jersey law firms and offices is steady for 2019. But steadiness doesn't mean stasis, program leaders say.
July 03, 2019 at 12:05 PM
6 minute read
Hiring of summer associates at New Jersey law firms and offices is steady for 2019, with about the same number of hires as last year, to go with a continued rise in average compensation.
But steadiness doesn't mean stasis, program leaders say.
At McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, the summer program “has evolved every year,” said Nicole Alexander, the Morristown-based firm's director of professional and business development. “It changes to keep up with the legal environment.”
The Law Journal's survey found that 17 bellwether firms in the state hired 77 summer associates this year: 15 1Ls and 62 2Ls. The total is effectively flat for the past several years. There were 79 total hires last year, 78 in 2017 and 75 in 2016.
Meanwhile, the steady increase in average compensation to 2L summer associates, tied to industrywide growth in first-year associate pay, continued. This year's $2,664 average weekly 2L salary (a weighted average) represents a 2.3% increase from last year's figure ($2,604).
And over the last three years, the average weekly salary for 2Ls has increased 15.6% among the group of 17 New Jersey firms—from $2,305 in 2016.
Firm to firm, changes in pay were relatively few from last year to this year. One exception was Cole Schotz, whose weekly salary for 2Ls increased to $2,700 from $2,500. The change is based on an increase in the firm's first-year associate salary to $145,000 from $135,000 as of September 2018.
Also this year, firms who brought their programs back in 2018 continued with them.
Greenbaum Rowe Smith & Davis, like many other firms in New Jersey and beyond, suspended its program postrecession, when there was increased uncertainty with year-to-year hiring needs. But the firm brought the program back in 2018, hiring three 2Ls at a weekly salary of $2,400, and it has hired the same size class this year.
“We wanted this program to really be about hiring,” said Stephanie Reckord, a litigation partner at the Woodbridge-based firm who leads the program and was a summer associate herself in 2005. “We felt at the time it wouldn't be fair [to continue with the program] unless we were really sure of our needs.”
More recently there was an internal push to bring the program back, particularly among former Greenbaum Rowe summers practicing at the firm, and a sense that it was ”important to keep the flow of young lawyers into the firm,” Reckord said. “We just thought it was time.”
So far it has gone well, it seems.
All of Greenbaum Rowe's 2018 summer associates got offers—one starts in September, while the other two are going into judicial clerkships and had their offers deferred, according to Reckord, who noted that the firm's hiring rate for summer associates has been good since before the program was suspended.
Reckord said the program was historically litigation heavy, but in the relaunched program, there is more coordination at the practice group level.
She added, ”We're not the only firm that has managed to figure this out and bring it back, which is exciting.”
Indeed, 2018 also saw McCarter & English relaunch its program after it went on hiatus in 2009. The program returned in a slightly different form, where hiring is decided at the practice group level. The program is back this year: two 1L hires, and three 2L hires at a $2,885 weekly salary.
For other firms, the evaluation continues. Genova Burns of Newark for the second consecutive year is not running a summer program after hosting five 2Ls per year in 2016 and 2017.
Chairman and managing partner Angelo Genova said the firm is “reconsidering the viability of a traditional summer associate program.”
“We have found and are experimenting with hiring from a recurring pool of highly competent candidates sourced from numerous places,” Genova said. “We are focusing on hiring those with experience from judicial clerkships, government service, and alternative tracks. This approach has contributed to the depth and experience of new members to our team who bring to bear external experiences and fresh perspectives to our varied practices.”
Firms that are historically active in hiring summer associates remain so this year.
Lowenstein Sandler's class—three 1Ls and 12 2Ls, with a 2L weekly salary of $3,300—is the largest of the group, as was the case each of the past three years.
Archer & Greiner has eight total hires: three 1Ls and five 2Ls, with a 2L weekly salary of $2,265. The firm had nine hires in 2018 and eight in 2017.
McElroy Deutsch had seven hires. That's two fewer than each of the prior two years, though the firmwide program is about the same size with additional summer hires at the New York office, Alexander said.
What has changed more are the interests of the associates, and how early on they begin considering those interests, Alexander said.
Among candidates, she said, there is “a demand for more professional development” and “a demand for work-life balance, and proof of it.” Candidates want “proof of a robust diversity and inclusion committee,” as well as billable-hour credit for pro bono work, Alexander added.
“It's definitely a different generation. It's a positive thing,” she said, because it encourages the firm to adapt and to reflect on its culture.
The programs, and the evolution, appear primed to continue, as the recruitment process now begins earlier in the year. Alexander and Reckord, as they spoke with the Law Journal, were planning July on-campus interviews for 2020 summer associate candidates.
“The new class is already on the horizon,” Alexander said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Weil Advances 18 to Partner, Largest Class Since 2021
- 2People and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
- 3Beef Between Two South Florida Law Firms Deepens With Suit Over Defamation
- 4Judge Skips Over Sanctions in Talc Bankruptcy: 'That’s A No'
- 5Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250