To Battle Shortage of Judges, Wolfson May Enlist Out-of-State Help
The number of judicial vacancies in New Jersey has grown because President Donald Trump has yet to make any District Court nominations for New Jersey during his two years in the White House.
July 03, 2019 at 03:27 PM
5 minute read
The shortage of judges that plagues New Jersey's federal courts became even worse on the first day of Freda Wolfson's tenure as chief judge.
The retirement of the previous chief judge, Jose Linares, in mid-May brought the number of vacancies to six on the state's federal bench, out of 17 authorized judgeships. The number of judicial vacancies in New Jersey has grown because President Donald Trump has yet to make any District Court nominations for New Jersey during his two years in the White House.
“We're in a whole new place, a different place than we were in the past, with six vacancies. It's more than a third of our court,” Wolfson said.
Even worse, federal judiciary officials in Washington have determined that the proper number of district court judges for New Jersey is 20, but only 17 judgeships are funded, she said.
While she can't do anything to fill the vacancies on the federal bench, some measures are being undertaken to mitigate the shortage, Wolfson said. And the District Court judges, magistrates and retired judges serving on recall continue to adeptly manage their heavy caseloads, even bringing case files along in the summer when they head to the beach or the mountains, she said.
“Obviously, we're all trying to do the best we can to continue to move our cases and handle them in the best way possible. That's our focus—getting the work of the court done. At the same time, we're a place where we continue to do programs to involve the bar, work with the federal bar—brown-bag lunches, professionalism day,” Wolfson said.
Federal court filings in the state continue to grow rapidly, particularly in the areas of multidistrict litigation and patent disputes, Wolfson said. And criminal filings have seen an uptick since Craig Carpenito became U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey in 2018, she said. As a result, the caseload per judge continues to grow rapidly, she notes.
Even before Linares' retirement, the District of New Jersey was deemed by the Administrative Office of U.S. Courts to be in a state of judicial emergency, with weighted filings of 903 cases per judgeship in 2018, the second highest in the nation, trailing only the Eastern District of Louisiana.
The state's shorthanded judicial district will get some relief from the creation of two additional magistrate judgeships, one in Trenton and another in Newark, she said. That initiative has been in the works for more than a year. The first new magistrate, Zahid Quraishi, formerly chairman of the white-collar defense practice and chief diversity officer at Riker Danzig, started his new post in early June. And on July 12, Edward Kiel, a litigator at Cole Schotz, will be sworn in, Wolfson said. She noted that magistrates handle nondispositive motions, discovery matters, settlement conferences and bail hearings in criminal cases.
“Also, lawyers can consent to magistrate jurisdiction for trial—maybe we'll see more of that,” she said.
Besides increasing the number of magistrates, the District of New Jersey may receive reinforcements from other district courts in the Third Circuit where judges aren't in such short supply, Wolfson said. She has spoken to her counterpart in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania about getting help from judges in that district, and the details are being hammered out, she said.
Wolfson won't rule out turning away future multidistrict litigation cases, a category that accounts for a large chunk of the New Jersey caseload. The Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation, which decides where drug litigation and other mass tort cases will be heard, frequently sends such cases to New Jersey. The state's District Court is currently host to thousands of mass tort cases, including suits claiming talcum powder from Johnson & Johnson contains cancer-causing asbestos particles, as well as other mass tort litigation concerning the drugs Benicar, Invocana, Plavix, Valsartan and proton pump inhibitor drugs.
“The MDL panel will call and ask if the district and the judge are agreeable to taking the case. In the future, we may consider whether it's appropriate to take on a new case if we're overload, but right now we have what we have. That may be something that we're going to consider in the future,” Wolfson said.
Wolfson graduated from Douglass College and Rutgers Law School, and worked for the now-defunct Clapp & Eisenberg and the firm now known as Lowenstein Sandler. She served as a U.S. magistrate judge from 1986 to 2002. That year, President George W. Bush nominated her to a seat on U.S. District Court.
Wolfson's best-known rulings include a 2013 decision upholding New Jersey's law banning so-called gay conversion therapy for minors. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed Wolfson's decision the following year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSocial Media Policy for Judges Provides Guidance in a Changing World
3 minute readBank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
3 minute read'Something Really Bad Happened': J&J's Talc Bankruptcy Vote Under Attack
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250