Deadline Looming For NJ Attorneys to Register, Avoid Ineligible Status
Judge Glenn Grant said the judiciary "is committed to leveraging technology in order to facilitate the annual attorney registration requirement in a paperless environment.”
July 10, 2019 at 05:57 PM
3 minute read
Judge Glenn A. Grant, acting administrative director of the New Jersey Courts, offered a final reminder Wednesday to attorneys that they must register with the state judiciary by July 22 in order to avoid ineligible status and late fees.
Attorneys were alerted in a previous notice from Grant on June 13 that those who do not complete the annual registration and payment process before the July 22 deadline will be declared ineligible to practice law in New Jersey by the Supreme Court, and will be included on a list of ineligible attorneys that will be published on that date. He encouraged filing electronically—including creating a now required P-Synch profile—to expedite the process, and said new security features have made it safer than ever.
On Wednesday, Grant highlighted the importance of technology.
“The judiciary is committed to leveraging technology in order to facilitate the annual attorney registration requirement in a paperless environment,” Grant said. “Electronic filing has created a more efficient and transparent process for attorneys, the courts and the public at large.
“Mandatory registration is essential to that process and we've extended the registration deadline in order to give the members of the bar every opportunity to comply,” added Grant.
Attorneys can complete their registration and payment by accessing the judiciary's “Attorney Online Registration and Payment Center” at https://www.njcourts.gov/attorneys/attreg.html. The center can also be accessed from the home page of the Judiciary website (njcourts.gov) by clicking on the “Attorneys” tab and then “Online Registration & Payment” under “Attorney & Judges Regulation.”
Grant said attorneys are required to complete the registration, certify to the completion of CLE credits (if applicable) and the completion of pro bono requirements, and pay the annual assessment, including any late fees.
Additionally, he said as indicated in a number of prior notices to the bar, as part of the judiciary's enhanced information security measures, all licensed New Jersey attorneys are now required to create a P-Synch profile. Creating a P-Synch profile involves two steps: users (1) must select and answer three personal security questions, to help with password recovery in the future if needed, and (2) must select a password that is exactly eight characters long and contains at least one capital letter, one lower case letter, one numeral, and one of the enumerated special characters. Profiles can be created on the attorney portal on the judiciary's website at https://portal.njcourts.gov/webe3/sso via the “Click here for P-Synch” link.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
Trending Stories
- 1Freshfields Hires SEC Associate Director in Latest D.C. Lateral Hiring Spree
- 2Jury Finds Dentons, Ex-Partner Beats Malpractice Claim Over $54 Million Currency Deal
- 3Former Cahill Executive Committee Member, Leveraged Finance Pioneer Dies at 67
- 4State Attorney General Faces Federal Courtroom Test Over Crypto Mining Ban
- 5The Corporate Transparency Act: One Year Later With Deadline Looming
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250