Budd Larner IP Group's Move to Windels Marx Leads to $3 Million Suit By Recruiter
The recruiter has sued Windels, Marx, Lane & Mittendorf claiming the firm has refused to pay a fee for the placement of Andrew Miller's IP group earlier this year.
July 11, 2019 at 08:00 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
A headhunting firm has sued Windels, Marx, Lane & Mittendorf for $3 million, claiming the law firm failed to pay a fee in connection with the placement of a prominent practice group from winding-down Budd Larner.
New York-based Austin & Devon Associates, led by legal recruiter Kim Valentini, said it put Andrew Miller and his “highly profitable” group of pharmaceuticals-focused intellectual property lawyers on the radar of Windels Marx managing partner Robert Luddy back in 2017.
Windels Marx, based in New York, ultimately hired Miller and his Budd Larner team to its New Jersey office in Madison in April, but the firm refused to pay the recruiter's fees, thought to be at least $3 million, said Austin & Devon in its Manhattan Supreme Court lawsuit.
The recruiter's complaint was filed Tuesday, the same day that Windels Marx announced that another group of Budd Larner attorneys—Jonathan Gray, Mark Larner and Frank Biancola—had joined its ranks.
“Austin & Devon did everything it promised to do—it introduced Windels Marx to a group of talented attorneys that the firm liked enough to hire,” the complaint said. “But despite reaping the rewards of Austin & Devon's work, Windels Marx will not honor its promises.”
The recruiting firm said it signed a contract with Windels Marx in 2013 that put a 12-month time limit on any obligation to pay Austin & Devon in the case of associates who were referred to the firm, according to the complaint. But because partner and group moves typically entail lengthy negotiations, no such limit applied, Austin & Devon claims.
According to the complaint, Valentini revealed Miller's willingness to make a move to Luddy in May 2017 and set up a meeting between the two men in June. But Luddy, the complaint said, told Valentini later that month to “sit tight,” and she didn't get a response to a follow-up she sent Luddy in July asking, “Anything new with Andrew or is it dead?”
Near the end of 2017, Valentini pitched Miller on joining another firm, only to learn from him that he was still going back and forth with Windels Marx, the complaint said. She emailed Luddy about it, but he didn't reply, it said.
In April, three days after Windels Marx publicized the move of 19 people, including Miller's team of 15 lawyers from Budd Larner, Valentini spoke with Luddy, the suit said. They discussed a firm that might be open to joining Windels Marx, but the Miller move also came up.
“Luddy told her that Windels Marx had just hired Miller and his group,” the suit states. “He told her he felt 'terrible' about the whole thing and that he didn't want her to find out about it from the legal press.”
Miller was on Budd Larner's executive committee. His group's departure came less than two months before the Law Journal reported that the Short Hills-based firm was planning to shut its doors this summer. The firm confirmed last month that it would shut its doors in July. That remains the plan, according to Budd Larner's website, which as of Wednesday listed only three lawyers.
Upon learning about Miller's move from Luddy, Austin & Devon's lawyer demanded payment, but it hasn't come, the suit said.
“Windels Marx understood what it was doing was wrong … but it still refused to pay what was promised,” Rob Glunt of MandelBhandari, who represents Valentini's recruiting firm, said.
A spokeswoman for Windels Marx declined to comment. Miller, who was not a party to the suit, did not return a message seeking comment Wednesday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPetitioners Seek to Remove 'Non-Lawyer' From ABA Vocabulary. Lively Discussion Ensues
Major Lindsey & Africa 'Blackballed' Associate Who Sued Troutman, Suit Claims
Facing Overcapacity, Law Firms Made Fewer Offers for 2024 Summer Associates
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250