BAR REPORT - Capitol Report
Status report provided by the NJSBA
July 22, 2019 at 08:01 AM
4 minute read
Supreme Court weighs in on municipal court operations, fines and fees
Following up on recommendations from the Supreme Court Committee on Municipal Court Operations, Fines and Fees, the high court issued administrative determinations in a report released earlier this month. The New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) issued comments supporting many of the committee's 49 recommendations, many of which have now been adopted. Recommendation 49 proposed creating a working group. The group was created immediately, and includes Joshua Reinitz, the immediate past chair of the NJSBA Municipal Court Practice Section.
Among the approved recommendations are:
- Create a Judiciary policy providing municipal court judges with guidelines for consideration of all available sentencing alternatives, both at the time of sentencing and as part of post-sentencing enforcement. The NJSBA supported this recommendation, noting that wider discretion in sentencing is preferable for all parties involved, as it allows the parties and the court to tailor the sentence more appropriately to the offense.
- Develop a policy and tools to assist municipal courts in establishing payment plans, determining defendant eligibility for other post-disposition sentencing alternatives, and making ability-to-pay determinations. The NJSBA supported this recommendation, especially for indigent people, because of the increased costs borne by a person who is found guilty of an offense, the extremely high cost of living in the state and the dearth of public transportation.
- Develop an opportunity for defendants who become delinquent on time payments to have an ability-to-pay hearing with proper notice to the defendant before a bench warrant or license suspension is issued. Another recommendation provides that bench warrants be limited to certain serious offenses, taking into account the seriousness of the offense charge, the age of the case and other relevant factors. The NJSBA supported this recommendation, with the added consideration that bench warrants should be issued in cases with consequences of magnitude.
- Develop a policy formalizing the process for the recalling of existing bench warrants for failure to pay for complaints that have been disposed, taking into account the age of the bench warrant, the seriousness of the conviction, the amount owed and any other relevant factors. Similarly, the recommendation was made to formalize the process for dismissal of old complaints that have not been disposed, taking into account the seriousness of the age of the case and other relevant factors. The NJSBA supported both recommendations.
- Develop additional tools and procedures for municipal court judges and staff to determine whether a defendant who has failed to appear or pay is incarcerated before a bench warrant or license suspension is issued. Similarly, municipal courts should recall bench warrants or rescind driver's license and vehicle registration suspensions when a defendant makes a subsequent good faith effort to report to court or to satisfy a legal financial obligation. The NJSBA supported both recommendations.
- With regard to compliance and legal financial obligations, the Supreme Court approved the establishment of a system for automated text, email, and/or telephonic reminders to defendants of upcoming or missed court dates and upcoming or missed legal financial due dates.
- Two additional recommendations sought to develop policies expanding the use of video and telephone appearances in appropriate instances and explore the establishment of a uniform online adjournment request process.
The Supreme Court Administrative Determinations on the Report and Recommendations of the Committee on Municipal Court Operations, Fines and Fees can be found under Notices to the Bar at njcourts.com.
This is a status report provided by the New Jersey State Bar Association on recently passed and pending legislation, regulations, gubernatorial nominations and/or appointments of interest to lawyers, as well as the involvement of the NJSBA as amicus in appellate court matters. To learn more, visit njsba.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250