A New Jersey appeals court has brandished its “blue pencil” to modify terms of ADP’s restrictive covenants that it determined were overly broad.

The appeals court reversed orders in cases involving three former ADP employees whose restrictive covenants were found so broad they were deemed unenforceable by a trial court. The appeals court also reversed decisions in three other cases where terms of the ADP restrictive covenants were not found unenforceable, but where the trial court made extensive modifications that were deemed too far-reaching on appeal.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]