Ocean County Jury Awards $1.46 Million in UIM Case
In Kaufman v. Jenkins, an Ocean County jury awarded $1.455 million on June 6 on an underinsured motorist claim by a woman who suffered spinal injuries…
July 26, 2019 at 11:02 AM
5 minute read
In Kaufman v. Jenkins, an Ocean County jury awarded $1.455 million on June 6 on an underinsured motorist claim by a woman who suffered spinal injuries in a rear-end crash. But the actual damages to the insurance carrier, New Jersey Manufacturers, is $400,000, based on policy limits of $500,000 for the plaintiff's underinsured motorist coverage and $100,000 for the motorist who struck the plaintiff.
Nicole Kaufman, 22, of Brick sustained permanent damage to the spine on November 26, 2015 when her car was struck by a vehicle driven by Kaitlyn Jenkins of Philadelphia. After resolving her claim with Jenkins' insurance company, Kaufman made an application to her family's underinsured motorist policy with New Jersey Manufacturers, which was initially denied, said plaintiff's lawyer Timothy Dinan of Laddey, Clark & Ryan in Sparta, who handled the case along with Andrew Fraser of the same firm. Later, New Jersey Manufacturers recognized the claim but offered only $50,000, said Dinan.
Kaufman took the underinsured motorist claim to trial before Superior Court Judge Craig Wellerson of Ocean County. The jury was not told that they were deciding a claim against an insurance carrier, said Dinan.
Experts for the plaintiff testified that Kaufman suffered a large tear in her spinal disc, resulting in permanent nerve damage, said Dinan. She has difficulty with walking, sitting, standing and sleeping, Dinan said. She needs spinal surgery but doctors are waiting due to the plaintiff's young age, Dinan said.
The $1.455 million represents the jury's conclusion on value of the damages suffered by the plaintiff, said Dinan. On June 6, Wellerson enterted a judgment against New Jersey Manufacturers for $400,000 on the underinsured motorist claim, taking into account the plaintiff's $500,000 policy limit and the $100,000 she received from Jenkins.
Patricia Adams of Campbell, Foley, Delano & Adams in Asbury Park, who represented New Jersey Manufacturers during trial, did not return a call about the case.
— Charles Toutant
|$525,000 Verdict in Middlesex
Perdun v. Henry Plaza Inc.: A woman injured in a fall in the parking lot of a mall where she worked was awarded $525,000 by a Middlesex County jury on March 18.
According to the attorneys in the case, on Nov. 30, 2015, plaintiff Jan Perdun tripped and fell in the parking lot of a strip mall located at 23 N. Main St., in Milltown, where she worked in one of the stores. She suffered a toe fracture. Perdun alleged she tripped due to a depression caused by a utility trench that had been previously installed. Her expert testified that the depression violated multiple codes.
Perdun sued property owner and manager Henry Plaza Inc., alleging it was negligent for allowing a dangerous condition to exist. Perdun also sued Brown & Glynn Construction Inc., which Henry Plaza had hired to install the utility trench. Although Brown & Glynn installed the utility trench, it was Henry Plaza's duty as property owner and manager to ensure there were no defects with the trench and, if there were any, it was then responsible for remediating it, the expert stated. The suit claimed John Henry, the owner of Henry Plaza, admittedly was on the property every day and yet failed to make any attempt to repair the trench. Brown & Glynn also was named.
Counsel for Henry Plaza argued Perdun was liable because she was wearing flip-flops at the time, and that her improper footwear contributed to the accident.
Counsel for Brown & Glynn maintained if there were any issues with the trench, Henry Plaza was obligated to notify Brown & Glynn. Brown & Glynn's expert in general contracting confirmed the decreased elevation created by the trench was dangerous and violated applicable property codes, and concluded it was the responsibility of the property owner to ensure that it was repaired and in a safe condition.
Perdun did not seek medical attention until eight weeks later. She alleged she did not realize the severity of her injury at first. Perdun's podiatrist diagnosed her with a fracture of one of her sesamoid bones in her right big toe. She was put on a course of physical therapy and underwent a series of cortisone injections. She later underwent surgical repair. Perdun's podiatrist opined she is prone to bunion deformity. Perdun testified she had to wear orthotics in order to maintain her balance. She stated she experiences pain in her right foot after long periods of standing. This allegedly is challenging in her job duties.
After a four-day trial before Middlesex County Superior Court Judge Gary K. Wolinetz, the jury found Henry Plaza 100 percent liable. No liability was found against Brown & Glyn. The jury awarded $525,000.
Nicholas J. Leonardis of Stathis & Leonardis in Edison represented Perdun.
Christopher E. Martin of Morrison Mahoney in Parsippany represented Henry Plaza.
Stephen J. Spudic of Britt, Riehl & Spudic in Freehold represented Brown & Glynn.
Henry Plaza was covered by Fitchburg Mutual Insurance Co.
*Editor's Comment: This report is based on information that was provided by plaintiff's and defense counsel.
— Adapted from VerdictSearch reports
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 2A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 3Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
- 4Navigating Twitter's 'Rocky Deal Process' Helped Drive Simpson Thacher's Tech and Telecom Practice
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250