BAR REPORT - Capitol Report
Judiciary mandates additional training for judges and will establish portal for public input
July 29, 2019 at 08:03 AM
3 minute read
Following widespread criticism leveled at judges' handling of sensitive matters, the Judiciary recently issued a directive mandating additional training for judges and promised to establish an online portal through which members of the public can provide anonymous feedback on their court experiences.
The action came in the wake of two Appellate Division opinions earlier this month calling into question statements made by two superior court judges in the context of hearings to determine if juvenile defendants charged with sexual assault should be tried as adults. The opinions followed in the footsteps of another judge facing a conduct hearing because of statements alleged to have been made to a sexual assault victim during a hearing in that matter.
In the directive issued on July 17, Judge Glenn A. Grant, acting administrative director of the courts, wrote, “Hundreds of Superior Court and Municipal Court judges fairly and justly adjudicate millions of matters in New Jersey courts each year, performing their work with devotion to fairness and justice while maintaining the highest standards of professionalism…That does not mean that we do not continue to improve, especially when particular events prompt us to engage in critical self-analysis that suggests the need to do more to instill the Judiciary's longstanding guiding policies and principles into our daily practices.”
The first of the statewide, bi-annual training sessions will occur before October of this year, when the courts will be closed for a mandatory full-day educational conference focusing on sexual assault, domestic violence, implicit bias and diversity. All superior court, tax court and appellate court judges, as well as Supreme Court justices, will be required to attend. A separate training will be scheduled for municipal court judges. Each vicinage also will be required to hold annual local training sessions focused on the same topics.
The action was viewed favorably by legislators and the governor, with Senator Loretta Weinberg, the sponsor of the first law requiring judicial training in handling domestic violence and abuse matters and legislation prohibiting no-disclosure agreements in sexual harassment cases, saying, “I am further encouraged by the Court's decision to create mandatory trainings in order to prevent and correct this type of behavior in the future. This is a strong step in the right direction, one that will go a long way in maintaining the integrity and reputation of our courts for years to come.”
In addition to the training, Judge Grant also announced the Judiciary will establish an online portal for individuals to anonymously share their courtroom experiences with the Administrative Office of the Courts. Currently, individuals can address concerns to assignment judges, trial court administrators, and county ombudsmen located in each courthouse. The online portal will expand those opportunities, however, and allow for anonymous reporting, if that is what an individual desires.
This is a status report provided by the New Jersey State Bar Association on recently passed and pending legislation, regulations, gubernatorial nominations and/or appointments of interest to lawyers, as well as the involvement of the NJSBA as amicus in appellate court matters. To learn more, visit njsba.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250