BAR REPORT - Capitol Report
State bar tracking several measures awaiting governor's action
August 05, 2019 at 08:02 AM
4 minute read
NJSBA tracking several measures awaiting gubernatorial action
A number of bills are still awaiting final action from the governor after landing on his desk following a flurry of activity before the Legislature adjourned for the summer. They include proposals the NJSBA is monitoring because they have the potential to impact practice areas, including land use, tax, elder and personal injury law.
HAINES FALLOUT
Two of the bills still on the governor’s desk seek to address the Court’s decision in Haines v. Taft, issued last spring. There, the Court concluded that litigants are prohibited from recovering uncompensated medical expenses above the purchased personal injury protection (PIP) limits in an automobile accident, citing to the legislative history of New Jersey’s No-Fault Law. The New Jersey State Bar Association supports S-2432/A-5371 (Scutari/Downey) and S-3963/A-5639 (Scutari/Downey), to the extent they allow the recovery of and apply the PIP fee schedule to such expenses, and prohibit balance billing.
COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES
Vacant or under-utilized commercial properties will have the opportunity for a makeover under S-1583/A-1700 (Cruz-Perez/Dancer), which amends the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law to allow municipalities to declare such properties in need of redevelopment. That has the potential of triggering other redevelopment tools, such as tax exemptions and abatements that can be offered to private sector partners to retool the blighted properties. The NJSBA supports the measure as an effective tool for municipalities to return vacant and abandoned properties to economic use.
TECH UPGRADE
Medicaid and NJ FamilyCare applicants will benefit from the technological improvements proposed under S-499/A-4569 (Vitale/Downey). That bill will allow the commissioner of human services to develop an electronic system to track information about applications and eligibility determinations for the program more accurately, and identify problem areas that need to be addressed. The NJSBA supports the measure as it is anticipated that it will benefit those in need of assistance from the programs.
TAX APPEALS
The NJSBA believes two other bills on the governor’s desk are unnecessary. S-2673/A-2004 (Diegnan/Karabinchak) would allow the repayment of excess property taxes following a successful tax appeal where the owner of any non-residential property is due over $100,000 to be paid over a three-year period. It does not permit the same three-year time period to apply for nonresidential property taxpayers who owe the municipality money following a successful reverse tax appeal—such payment would be due and owing within 60 days pursuant to existing case law.
While the bill purports to ameliorate funding problems plaguing some municipalities, the NJSBA believes it is unnecessary since most appeals are settled under similar payment arrangements anyway. The association, along with a coalition of industry stakeholders, urged amendments to the bill, including clarification that the interest owed on the balance includes the unpaid balance throughout the repayment period; to ensure the same time period applies to reverse appeals; and to increase the threshold to $1 million.
ZONING IN ON ZONING
Similarly, S-3212/A-4741 (Ruiz/Pintor Marin) would permit municipalities to establish temporary supplemental zoning boards of adjustment to address application backlogs. The association does not believe application backlogs are a widespread, insurmountable problem. Further, the NJSBA believes this proposed solution will create additional concerns, such as untrained and inexperienced zoning boards considering applications with little guidance, and applicants engaging in strategic maneuvering to trigger a temporary board review to obtain a particular outcome.
This is a status report provided by the New Jersey State Bar Association on recently passed and pending legislation, regulations, gubernatorial nominations and/or appointments of interest to lawyers, as well as the involvement of the NJSBA as amicus in appellate court matters. To learn more, visit njsba.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250