States Make Their Own Push Forward With New Overtime Rules
In November 2016 a federal judge agreed that the Obama salary threshold proposal was an overreach. Now states are taking up the issue themselves.
August 09, 2019 at 09:54 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Disappointed by the Trump administration’s inaction on the issue, a number of states are moving to make more workers eligible for mandatory overtime pay.
In the final year of President Obama’s administration, the Department of Labor issued a new rule that would raise the salary threshold at which workers can be exempt from mandatory overtime wages. The proposed rule raised the threshold, which was last raised in 2004, from $23,660 to $47,476.
However, several Republican attorneys general sued to block implementation of the rule and in November 2016 a federal judge agreed that the Obama proposal was an overreach. Although the Obama administration appealed the ruling, the Trump administration abandoned that appeal several months later.
In March, the Trump administration proposed raising the threshold to $35,308. The rule has not yet been finalized but so far it appears to have been warmly received by employer groups, who view it as a middle ground between the status quo and the Obama proposal.
Labor advocates, however, say the Trump proposal falls far short of what is needed and prevents millions of non-management employees from getting paid for overtime hours.
Some state governments agree. In Pennsylvania, Gov. Tom Wolf last year introduced a plan that mirrors the Obama plan, and will gradually increase the threshold to $48,000.
Other states are going further. The Department of Labor in Washington state has proposed raising the threshold to $79,872 beginning in 2026. In Maine, the threshold is currently set at $33,000, but state lawmakers are pushing to increase it to $55,000 by the end of 2022.
In Massachusetts, lawmakers are considering a bill that would also increase the threshold over the next few years: to $35,000 in 2021; $45,000 in 2022; $55,000 in 2023; and $64,000 in 2024.
Commenting on the Massachusetts legislation, the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank, said the proposal would simply be restoring the overtime opportunities that existed for workers in the past.
“If the 1975 threshold, which covered nearly 63 percent of the salaried workforce, were simply raised with inflation up to today and projected inflation out to 2024, it would be equal to $1,268 per week—nearly identical to the threshold proposed (in the Massachusetts legislation,” wrote David Cooper of EPI in June.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Attorney General's Office Announces Major Shake-Up for Executive Leadership Team
4 minute read'Bewitched by the Technology': $300K to Settle Faulty Facial Recognition
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250