Judge Rejects Bergen Prosecutor's Bid to Compel Defense Lawyer's Testimony Against His Client
The judge ruled prosecutors failed to show they could not obtain the information elsewhere.
August 16, 2019 at 06:16 PM
4 minute read
A Superior Court judge has denied a motion by the Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office to compel a criminal defense lawyer to testify before a grand jury against his own client.
Judge Margaret Foti issued a written ruling Thursday on the motion to compel Bloomfield attorney Landry Belizaire to testify about his representation of Roydell Cameron on sexual assault charges. But the judge’s 28-page opinion has not been made public because the prosecutor’s office sought to have it placed under seal. The prosecutor’s office said the opinion should not be made public because it contains grand jury information.
On Friday, Foti ordered prosecutor to identify content in the opinion that it wants to redact, and then other parties in the case will have a chance to review the proposed redactions.
Foti ruled that the prosecutor’s office is not entitled to subpoena Belizaire because it failed to demonstrate the information it seeks is not available elsewhere, according to Raymond Brown Jr. of Scarinci Hollenbeck in Lyndhurst, who represents Belizaire along with colleague Rachel Simon.
“The important point here is a relatively young lawyer, under pressure from the state, stood up and said ‘I will assert my attorney client privilege.’ Thereafter, many in the defense bar rallied to this cause, because this is a critically important issue,” Brown said. “If clients can’t trust their lawyers to keep their conversations in confidence, the system of justice collapses.”
The prosecutor’s office announced in April that it was charging Cameron in connection with a sexual assault that took place in 2005 in Palisades Park. After Cameron retained Belizaire and arranged to surrender to police, he failed to appear at the scheduled time. Cameron was later apprehended at John F. Kennedy Airport, where he had boarded a plane for Jamaica.
The prosecutor’s office served Belizaire with a subpoena duces tecum for documents, including all communications with his client and with any third parties concerning the voluntary surrender. The subpoena also seeks to compel Belizaire to testify against his client before a grand jury. The move by the prosecutor’s office left Belizaire conflicted out of representing Cameron, and he had to withdraw. Cameron is now represented by Hackensack attorney Brian Neary.
The prosecutor’s office has claimed that the crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege applies to its subpoena of Belizaire. The assistant prosecutor on the case, Danielle Grootenboer, has stated that she doesn’t think Belizaire was complicit in Cameron’s attempt to flee.
Foti denied the prosecutors’ motion after hearing from two amici curiae, the Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers-New Jersey and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, which objected to the attempt to compel Belizaire to testify.
“The state treated this like it was an ordinary witness to the grand jury—that was the thing that was disturbing, not recognizing how central the lawyer-client relationship is,” said Alan Silber of Pashman Stein Walder Hayden in Hackensack, who represented the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers along with colleague Dillon McGuire.
Matthew Adams of Fox Rothschild in Morristown, along with associate Marissa Koblitz Kingman, represents the Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers-New Jersey. Adams said there will be an effort to convince Attorney General Gurbir Grewal that prosecutors must seek special permission from the attorney general before seeking to compel a defense lawyer to testify against a client. Federal prosecutors are already required to seek permission from the U.S. attorney before serving a subpoena on a defense lawyer, Adams said.
“It’s a matter of such constitutional significance that it ought to be done in the narrowest of circumstances,” Adams said.
Neary, the Hackensack lawyer who took over as counsel to Cameron when Belizaire was conflicted out, was pleased with the judge’s ruling. “Everybody wins when a court protects a person’s sacred right to counsel, especially when faced with the state’s attack on that relationship,” he said. In 1989, Neary represented attorney Joseph Nackson in a case that is considered a seminal authority on attorney-client privilege. In that case, In re Nackson, the court ruled that the attorney properly refused to disclose to a grand jury the whereabouts of a client who consulted him about a fugitive warrant.
Maureen Parenta, spokeswoman for the Bergen County Prosecutor’s Office, declined to comment on the ruling.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Attorney General's Office Announces Major Shake-Up for Executive Leadership Team
4 minute read'Bewitched by the Technology': $300K to Settle Faulty Facial Recognition
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250