Case of Wheelchair Struck by Bus Settles for $4.1 Million in Mercer
A paraplegic man struck by a bus while crossing the street settled his Mercer County suit, Urbina-Mejia v. Gaskill, on Aug. 14 for $4.1 million. According…
August 22, 2019 at 10:00 AM
5 minute read
A paraplegic man struck by a bus while crossing the street settled his Mercer County suit, Urbina-Mejia v. Gaskill, on Aug. 14 for $4.1 million.
According to court documents and attorneys involved in the case, plaintiff Eder Francisco Urbina-Mejia on Jan. 15, 2018, was waiting to cross Atlantic Avenue at Montpelier Avenue in Atlantic City. Urbina-Mejia and a commercial bus driven by defendant Lloyd Gaskill were traveling in the same direction and were stopped at a red light. After the light turned green, Urbina-Mejia proceeded to cross in the crosswalk, and Gaskill made a left turn, striking him in the crosswalk.
Urbina-Mejia, a Honduran national and resident of Wisconsin who was visiting family in Atlantic City, sustained bone fractures in his legs and urological injuries, and the suit also claimed emotional distress, said his lawyer, Eric Kahn of Javerbaum Wurgaft Hicks Kahn Wikstrom & Sinins in Springfield.
Urbina-Mejia was hospitalized for 16 days at AtlantiCare Regional Medical Center, and then at University of Wisconsin Medical Center for four more weeks after his return to Wisconsin, Kahn said.
The suit named Gaskill, claiming he negligently operated the bus, and his employer, Starr Transit Co., which owned the bus, court documents said.
The suit was venued in Mercer County, where Starr Transit is based.
Claims against Starr Transit were voluntarily dismissed, and Urbina-Mejia settled with Gaskill for $4.1 million on Aug. 14, in mediation with Bette Uhrmacher, a retired New Jersey Superior Court judge now with ADR Options in Philadelphia.
Starr Transit’s insurance carrier is to pay the settlement.
The parties were in expert discovery when the matter settled, Kahn noted.
Counsel to Gaskill and Starr Transit, Joseph Goldberg of Weber Gallagher Simpson Stapleton Fires & Newby in Philadelphia, confirmed the settlement.
— David Gialanella
Police Shooting Yields $1.1M Settlement
Taylor v. Ambrifi: A man who was shot during a confrontation with police officers agreed to a $1.1 million settlement of his federal civil rights suit on May 10.
According to court documents and lawyers involved in the case, Eugene Taylor, now 27, is paranoid schizophrenic, and at 3:45 a.m. on May 14, 2013, he was heard speaking loudly about Jesus Christ while wandering along the bank of the Delaware River in Delanco, prompting a local resident to call 911.
Officer Francisco Ambrifi of the Delanco Police Department, who responded, ordered Taylor to put his hands up, but Taylor didn’t do so and continued to speak in a rambling manner about Jesus Christ, the suit said. The officer sprayed Taylor in the face with pepper spray, but he still did not follow instructions. Ambrifi then used his training in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu to take Taylor to the ground, and struck him on the head and shoulders with a flashlight, the suit said. Ambrifi then drew his service weapon and shot Taylor three times. Ambrifi also shot himself once in the leg.
Ambrifi called for backup after the shooting. Three officers came to the scene and helped restrain Taylor, including John Harris, a police officer with Edgewater Park Township, who struck Taylor, the suit said.
Taylor was hospitalized for one month after the shooting. He suffered multiple broken ribs and a punctured lung, and underwent numerous emergency surgeries. He lost a portion of his lung, has bullet fragments permanently lodged in his chest, and his shoulder frequently dislocates, and he experiences chronic pain and scarring, the suit claimed.
Taylor filed suit against Ambrifi, Delanco Township, Harris and the Township of Edgewater Park.
After U.S. District Judge Noel Hillman of the District of New Jersey denied the defendants’ motions for summary judgment on claims for constitutional violations and disability discrimination in July 2018, the parties engaged in mediation. In October 2018, the parties reported to the court that the case was settled. The defendants agreed to pay $1.1 million to Taylor. A disagreement over the language of the settlement agreement put a final resolution in the dispute on hold until May 2019, said Daniella Gordon of Hyland Levin Shapiro in Marlton, who represented Taylor along with Barry Pollack of Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber in Washington, D.C., in an email to the Law Journal.
Ambrifi and Delanco were represented by John Gillespie of Parker McCay in Mount Laurel, who confirmed the settlement.
Michele Corea of Capehart Scatchard in Mount Laurel, counsel to Harris and Edgewater Park, didn’t return a call about the settlement.
— Charles Toutant
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Division Rejects Third Circuit Interpretation of NJ Law, Says No Arbitration for Insurance Fraud
4 minute readNJ Manufacturing Company Sues Insurer to Recoup PFAS Remediation Losses
4 minute readAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Attorney Sanctioned $9K for Revealing Nude Photos, Other Info in Court Filing
- 2Shifting Battlegrounds in Administrative Law, From Biden to Trump II
- 3Bar Report - Jan. 13
- 4Newsmakers: Robert Collins, Barron Wallace Elected to Bracewell’s Management Committee
- 5Navigating the Shifting Sands of E-Discovery and Information Governance in 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250