A New Jersey appeals court has overturned an order compelling arbitration of a malpractice suit brought by a former client against Sills Cummis & Gross in Newark.

A Sills Cummis arbitration agreement violated the Rules of Professional Conduct and is unenforceable because it referenced 33 pages of JAMS arbitration rules, yet the client was never given a copy of those rules, the appeals court said in Delaney v. Dickey on Friday.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]