Caren Ulrich Stacy (left) and Lisa Kirby of Diversity Lab. (Courtesy photos)Day Pitney Among 64 Firms Diversity Initiative Named 'Mansfield 2.0' Certified
The newest round of certification comes as corporate clients increasingly tie legal spend to diversity.
September 03, 2019 at 10:58 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Sixty-four firms are now "Mansfield 2.0 Certified"—a notable badge of success for law firms in a legal environment that increasingly ties diversity to profits.
Launched in 2018 by the legal diversity organization Diversity Lab, firms that are "Mansfield" certified have revamped their recruiting and promotion processes to ensure that 30% of potential candidates for "significant" leadership roles are diverse.
Notable positions include compensation committee partner, equity partner, lateral partner and practice group head. The initiative is in its second year, hence the "2.0″ designation, which for the first time included LGBTQ+ candidates. Mansfield 3.0 will include lawyers with disabilities.
"Our plan is to raise the bar each year," said Lisa Kirby, Diversity Lab chief intelligence and knowledge sharing officer, in a statement. "It's especially meaningful to lead this initiative this year because it marks the 150th anniversary of Arabella Mansfield's becoming the first woman admitted to a U.S. bar association."
The initiative is a twist on the National Football League's "Rooney Rule," which requires teams to interview at least one minority candidate for the general manager or head coaching positions.
The new round of certification comes as clients have increasingly tied diversity to legal spend: More than 200 GCs have signed onto January's open letter warning firms that they will lose work if they don't staff their matters with diverse teams. Many see being Mansfield certified as a very public way to show that a firm has made a commitment to diversity, and Diversity Lab has even built the client-firm relationship into the program.
The 64 firms on this year's list are: Akerman; Fasken Munger, Tolles & Olson; Arnold & Porter; Fenwick & West Neal; Gerber & Eisenberg; Baker Botts; Finnegan; Nixon Peabody; Baker McKenzie; Fish & Richardson; Norton Rose Fulbright; Beveridge & Diamond; Foley & Mansfield; O'Melveny & Myers; Blank Rome; Goodwin; Orrick; Brinks Gilson & Lione; Goulston & Storrs; Pepper Hamilton; Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck; Hogan Lovells; Reed Smith; Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner; Holland & Hart; Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr; Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney; Holland & Knight; Schiff Hardin; Clifford Chance; Husch Blackwell; Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis; Cooley; Jenner & Block; Seyfarth Shaw; Covington; Katten Muchin; Sheppard Mullin; Crowell & Moring; Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck; Steptoe; Day Pitney; Latham & Watkins; Stoel Rives; Dechert Littler Mendelson; White & Case; Dentons; McDermott Will & Emery; Wilmer; DLA Piper; Merchant & Gould; Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati; Dorsey & Whitney; Miller Canfield; Winston & Strawn; Drinker Biddle & Reath; Morgan Lewis; Womble Bond Dickinson; Eversheds Sutherland; Morris, Manning & Martin; Faegre Baker Daniels; Morrison & Foerster.
Certified firms have the opportunity to send their newly-promoted diverse attorneys to one of four client forums, a small group networking forum between the firm attorneys and senior in-house counsel from more than 60 companies including Barclays, Google and U.S. Bank.
Chemical company BASF has required its firms to fill out the American Bar Association model diversity survey and demanded them to bring diverse teams to all of their pitches for a few years now. When the first phase of the Mansfield initiative launched in 2017, BASF went a step further and began a push to ensure that their top 25 firms in terms of legal spend got Mansfield certified.
"Having diverse teams is good for a lot of reasons," said Sneha Desai, BASF's associate general counsel for litigation. "But the collective voice from clients like us, Walmart, HP and 3M will drive better legal and business results."
BASF has been successful in helping get a majority with their firms certified, including Hogan Lovells. Hogan CEO Steve Immelt said that the most key aspect Mansfield process is the formalization of diversity programming and infrastructure, something that law firms neglected for too long.
"The critical thing with improving diversity and inclusion is to get tactical," Immelt said. "We need to get people off of autopilot and recognize there are implicit biases in our work."
According to Diversity Lab, participating firms reported higher diversity representation in several aspects:
- 92% of participating firms reported a higher percentage of diverse attorneys participating in formal pitches;
- 78% of participating firms hired a higher percentage of diverse lateral senior associates;
- 65% of participating firms promoted a higher percentage of diverse lawyers into equity partnership; and
- 57% of participating firms elected or appointed a higher percentage of diverse lawyers into Office Head positions
Ninety-nine firms have signed on for the next round of certification, Mansfield 3.0, which runs from July 2019 to July 2020. Five of the participating firms—Eversheds Sutherland, Hogan Lovells, Holland & Hart, Miller Canfield, and Stoel Rives—have volunteered to pilot a more intensive program, which measures individual demographic groups.
Additionally, several firms have also achieved Mansfield "Plus" status, which requires that a firm reach at least 30 percent diverse lawyer representation in a notable number of their current leadership roles and committees.
Those firms that have achieved plus status are: Arnold & Porter; Baker Botts; Baker McKenzie; Beveridge & Diamond; Blank Rome; Brinks Gilson & Lione; Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner; Buchanan, Ingersoll & Rooney; Cooley; Covington; Day Pitney; Dechert; Dentons; DLA Piper; Dorsey & Whitney; Drinker Biddle & Reath; Eversheds Sutherland; Faegre Baker Daniels; Fenwick & West; Finnegan; Fish & Richardson; Goodwin; Goulston & Storrs; Hogan Lovells; Holland & Hart; Holland & Knight; Husch Blackwell; Jenner & Block; Latham & Watkins; Littler Mendelson; McDermott Will & Emery; Miller Canfield; Morgan Lewis; Morris, Manning & Martin; Morrison & Foerster; Munger, Tolles & Olson; Nixon Peabody; Norton Rose Fulbright; O'Melveny & Myers; Orrick; Reed Smith; Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr; Schiff Hardin; Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis; Sheppard Mullin; Steptoe; Stoel Rives; White & Case; WilmerHale; Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati; and Winston & Strawn.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
MDL Judge: 'Significant Number of Plaintiffs' Can't Allege Paraquat Exposure
8 minute read
Why the Wide Range of Roundup Verdicts? It Might Depend on What Juries Hear About the EPA
8 minute read
Roundup MDL Lead Counsel Defend Fee Allocations: 'Limited Funds Available'
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
