Johnson & Johnson has moved for a mistrial in a high-stakes talcum powder case after the judge struck the closing argument of its attorney, Weil, Gotshal & Manges partner Diane Sullivan, then allowed the plaintiffs attorneys to wrap up with statements “soaked with venom.”

In a motion filed on Monday, Johnson & Johnson said Middlesex County Superior Court Judge Ana Viscomi’s decision to strike Sullivan’s Sept. 4 closing arguments was improper and prejudiced the jury, which is in deliberations.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]