Head-On Crash Case Settles For $3.97 Million in Morris
A woman who suffered a traumatic brain injury in a head-on crash received $3.97 million on July 24 to settle her Morris County suit, Ellas v. Cavaliere. Plaintiff…
September 13, 2019 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
A woman who suffered a traumatic brain injury in a head-on crash received $3.97 million on July 24 to settle her Morris County suit, Ellas v. Cavaliere.
Plaintiff Aliki Ellas was driving north on Bernardsville Road in Mendham Borough on March 28, 2017, when an oncoming car crossed the center line and struck her vehicle head-on. The other driver, Alexander Cavaliere, then 18, could not explain what caused him to lose control of his vehicle, said plaintiff lawyer Todd Leonard of the Todd J. Leonard Law Firm in Denville. Cavaliere pleaded guilty to a charge of careless driving with a civil reservation in connection with the crash, Leonard said.
Ellas was a local realtor who was driving in the course of her employment at the time of the crash, Leonard said. She has been unable to continue in that job, he said. In addition to the traumatic brain injury, Ellas sustained injury to her inner ear, a right humerus fracture, left femur fracture, and right ankle fracture, which required surgery, according to Leonard.
The defendant didn't dispute that she had permanent orthopedic injuries, but disputed the nature and extent of her other injuries, Leonard said.
Ellas' workers' compensation lien was approximately $500,000, according to Leonard.
The parties settled for $3.97 million on June 20 in mediation with Mark Epstein, a retired Superior Court judge now with Hoagland, Longo, Moran, Dunst & Doukas in New Brunswick. Payment was received on July 24.
The defendant had an automobile policy with New Jersey Manufacturers with a $500,000 policy limit, and $10 million in excess coverage through Chubb Insurance Co. He was represented by William Cunningham of Kirmser, Lamastra, Cunningham & Skinner in Whitehouse Station, who did not return a call about the case.
— Charles Toutant
|$1.16M Med Mal Verdict in Passaic
Ortega v. Saba: A woman who experienced complications during a hysterectomy and claimed that her doctor failed to advise her about alternatives to the surgery was awarded $1.16 million by a Passaic County jury, though a high-low agreement put in place prior to the verdict capped her recovery at $600,000. The $600,000 sum was paid on July 31.
Plaintiff Rosa Ortega was treated by defendant obstetrician-gynecologist Soheil Saba for uterine bleeding, according to her lawyer, Kenneth D'Amato of Sunshine, Atkins, Minassian, Tafuri, D'Amato, & Beane in River Edge. In September 2014, at age 37, she underwent a hysterectomy at St. Mary's Hospital in Passaic, which resulted in a bowel obstruction necessitating a partial colectomy and ileostomy, D'Amato said, noting that the ileostomy was reversed eight months later.
The suit alleged that Saba failed to obtain informed consent for the hysterectomy, and that Saba failed to advise Ortega of other treatments for her condition, such as birth control. The suit claimed Saba should have offered other options because of Ortega's medical history, including renal disease.
Claims against the hospital were withdrawn prior to trial, and claims against another obstetrician-gynecologist involved in the surgery were dismissed by the court during trial.
Saba disputed liability, contended that the surgery was the only effective treatment for Ortega's condition, and that Ortega's preexisting condition from years of dialysis actually caused the bowel blockage, according to D'Amato.
Claims against Saba were tried for three weeks before Passaic County Superior Court Judge Bruno Mongiardo, and the verdict came on July 2. The eight-member jury unanimously found that Saba deviated from the standard of care, and found 7-1 that a reasonable person wouldn't have consented to the surgery if properly advised. The panel also was unanimous in finding that the deviation caused the harm, and that the outcome would have differed if the treatment were different. The jury unanimously awarded $1.16 million for pain and suffering. None of the damages were attributed to Ortega's preexisting condition.
The parties entered into a high-low agreement during jury deliberations, with a $600,000 high and a $100,000 low, D'Amato said. The verdict triggered the $600,000 amount, and Mongiardo entered judgment in that amount on July 26, according to electronic court records.
Saba was represented by Philip Mattia and Haley Grieco of Mattia & McBride in Fairfield. They didn't respond to requests for comment.
— David Gialanella
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250