Head-On Crash Case Settles For $3.97 Million in Morris
A woman who suffered a traumatic brain injury in a head-on crash received $3.97 million on July 24 to settle her Morris County suit, Ellas v. Cavaliere. Plaintiff…
September 13, 2019 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
A woman who suffered a traumatic brain injury in a head-on crash received $3.97 million on July 24 to settle her Morris County suit, Ellas v. Cavaliere.
Plaintiff Aliki Ellas was driving north on Bernardsville Road in Mendham Borough on March 28, 2017, when an oncoming car crossed the center line and struck her vehicle head-on. The other driver, Alexander Cavaliere, then 18, could not explain what caused him to lose control of his vehicle, said plaintiff lawyer Todd Leonard of the Todd J. Leonard Law Firm in Denville. Cavaliere pleaded guilty to a charge of careless driving with a civil reservation in connection with the crash, Leonard said.
Ellas was a local realtor who was driving in the course of her employment at the time of the crash, Leonard said. She has been unable to continue in that job, he said. In addition to the traumatic brain injury, Ellas sustained injury to her inner ear, a right humerus fracture, left femur fracture, and right ankle fracture, which required surgery, according to Leonard.
The defendant didn't dispute that she had permanent orthopedic injuries, but disputed the nature and extent of her other injuries, Leonard said.
Ellas' workers' compensation lien was approximately $500,000, according to Leonard.
The parties settled for $3.97 million on June 20 in mediation with Mark Epstein, a retired Superior Court judge now with Hoagland, Longo, Moran, Dunst & Doukas in New Brunswick. Payment was received on July 24.
The defendant had an automobile policy with New Jersey Manufacturers with a $500,000 policy limit, and $10 million in excess coverage through Chubb Insurance Co. He was represented by William Cunningham of Kirmser, Lamastra, Cunningham & Skinner in Whitehouse Station, who did not return a call about the case.
— Charles Toutant
$1.16M Med Mal Verdict in Passaic
Ortega v. Saba: A woman who experienced complications during a hysterectomy and claimed that her doctor failed to advise her about alternatives to the surgery was awarded $1.16 million by a Passaic County jury, though a high-low agreement put in place prior to the verdict capped her recovery at $600,000. The $600,000 sum was paid on July 31.
Plaintiff Rosa Ortega was treated by defendant obstetrician-gynecologist Soheil Saba for uterine bleeding, according to her lawyer, Kenneth D'Amato of Sunshine, Atkins, Minassian, Tafuri, D'Amato, & Beane in River Edge. In September 2014, at age 37, she underwent a hysterectomy at St. Mary's Hospital in Passaic, which resulted in a bowel obstruction necessitating a partial colectomy and ileostomy, D'Amato said, noting that the ileostomy was reversed eight months later.
The suit alleged that Saba failed to obtain informed consent for the hysterectomy, and that Saba failed to advise Ortega of other treatments for her condition, such as birth control. The suit claimed Saba should have offered other options because of Ortega's medical history, including renal disease.
Claims against the hospital were withdrawn prior to trial, and claims against another obstetrician-gynecologist involved in the surgery were dismissed by the court during trial.
Saba disputed liability, contended that the surgery was the only effective treatment for Ortega's condition, and that Ortega's preexisting condition from years of dialysis actually caused the bowel blockage, according to D'Amato.
Claims against Saba were tried for three weeks before Passaic County Superior Court Judge Bruno Mongiardo, and the verdict came on July 2. The eight-member jury unanimously found that Saba deviated from the standard of care, and found 7-1 that a reasonable person wouldn't have consented to the surgery if properly advised. The panel also was unanimous in finding that the deviation caused the harm, and that the outcome would have differed if the treatment were different. The jury unanimously awarded $1.16 million for pain and suffering. None of the damages were attributed to Ortega's preexisting condition.
The parties entered into a high-low agreement during jury deliberations, with a $600,000 high and a $100,000 low, D'Amato said. The verdict triggered the $600,000 amount, and Mongiardo entered judgment in that amount on July 26, according to electronic court records.
Saba was represented by Philip Mattia and Haley Grieco of Mattia & McBride in Fairfield. They didn't respond to requests for comment.
— David Gialanella
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A More Nuanced Issue': NJ Supreme Court Considers Appellate Rules for Personal Injury Judgments
5 minute readAppellate Division Rejects Third Circuit Interpretation of NJ Law, Says No Arbitration for Insurance Fraud
4 minute readNJ Manufacturing Company Sues Insurer to Recoup PFAS Remediation Losses
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 2Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 3Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 4Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 5Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firm's Innovation Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250