NJ Top 40: 'The Numbers Do Tell the Tale'
As legal industry leaders grow increasingly cognizant of the business—not only the practice—of law, more law firms and branch offices in New Jersey…
September 29, 2019 at 01:00 PM
5 minute read
As legal industry leaders grow increasingly cognizant of the business—not only the practice—of law, more law firms and branch offices in New Jersey are growing revenue than are growing attorney head counts, the Law Journal's annual Top 40 project has found for the second straight year.
That means gains in gross revenue are generally more owing to improved generation on a per-lawyer basis than growth in sheer firm size, according to the list, which is ordered by fiscal 2018 gross revenue derived from New Jersey offices. (See the editor's note below for more information, including methodology).
Just eight firms and offices significantly increased their New Jersey attorney head counts in 2018, while nearly four times that many firms either decreased their head counts or were essentially flat—the latter meaning a net change of two or fewer lawyers year over year.
Meanwhile, nearly half of the listed firms improved their New Jersey-based revenue year over year in 2018, and most of those did so without significantly growing attorney head count. That indicates widespread improvement in revenue per lawyer—held by some to be the key metric by which to measure a firm's fiscal health.
There has been a bit of turnover in the NJ Top 40. Both Budd Larner and LeClairRyan, which folded this year, have been removed from the list. And two firms were added: Red Bank-based Giordano Halleran & Ciesla (No. 31), and the Florham Park office of Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker (No. 36).
Revenue per law (RPL) may be a good barometer, but gross revenue and attorney head count still matter. Some firms saw growth in all three categories.
One such firm is Brach Eichler of Roseland.
"I focus on that quite a bit," managing partner John Fanburg said of RPL, and the firm's improvement in that metric (to $627,000 from $566,000, a 10.8% jump) helped bring about a 12.8% year-over-year increase in New Jersey-based revenue in 2018, and vaulted the firm into the top half of the list. Its $43.1 million in New Jersey-based revenue ranks it No. 18.
The firm grew by attorney head count, but more modestly. It had a net gain of two lawyers, for a total of 69.
According to Fanburg, the firm was up to 73 full-time equivalents through August of this year. Though, he said, "we don't want to grow too fast." Outside of the addition of a four-lawyer personal injury group in mid-2016, the firm has added laterals by ones and twos, he added.
Rapid growth by acquisition "has the potential for changing the culture," Fanburg said. "Cultures evolve … but we want to be gradual and do it on our own."
Head count growth also affects overhead, and overhead is something Brach Eichler has been careful about, he said—noting that head count has the potential to mount, with additional hires creating expenses that are addressed by hiring more laterals to bill more time.
"You can have [strong] RPL but low profitability because your overhead's out of control," Fanburg said.
Fanburg said his firm's lawyers have billed more, and have been increasing rates incrementally each January, and he credited litigation, real estate, health care and corporate/tax practice groups with strong revenue generation.
Roseland-based Connell Foley also grew in gross revenue, revenue per lawyer and attorney head count last year. The firm (ranked No. 12) had an 11.6% year-over-year increase in gross revenue, to $57.7 million. It also had a 2% increase in RPL, to $451,000. Finally, the firm grew its New Jersey-based attorney head count by 9.4%, to 128, in 2018.
"The numbers do tell the tale—we are growing nicely," managing partner Philip McGovern Jr. said.
Recent hires, he added, should continue to have a positive impact for the firm. "When you bring any lawyer into the firm, there's typically a long time from when they start working and billing to when you actually start collecting on the time."
McGovern, like Fanburg, talked about managing overhead.
At some firms, that has meant cutting staff, via buyouts or other means, but McGovern said Connell Foley has taken no such measures. Still, the firm's staff has stayed essentially the same size even as the firm has added attorneys, he said: "Existing staff have absorbed more attorneys."
Asked what it takes for a New Jersey-homegrown firm to succeed in the current market, McGovern said, "You have to be out there. You have to be a known commodity in the business world."
"The first file might be some referral from a friend," McGovern added, "but you're not going to get the second one unless you do a really good job on the first one."
*Editor's note on methodology: The Law Journal ranks firms based on gross revenue derived from New Jersey offices. For firmwide attorney head count and gross revenue for each firm ranked, please see the chart's two righthand columns. Information is gathered from law firm surveys, ALM Legal Intelligence, documents, news coverage, on-background interviews with sources, and other sources. Figures are rounded. Estimates are utilized where necessary based on information gathered by the Law Journal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNeighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?
7 minute readAn Overview of Proposed Changes to the Federal Rules of Procedure Relating to the Expansion of Remote Trial Testimony
15 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Avantia Publicly Announces Agentic AI Platform Ava
- 2Shifting Sands: May a Court Properly Order the Sale of the Marital Residence During a Divorce’s Pendency?
- 3Joint Custody Awards in New York – The Current Rule
- 4Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Continues Finance Practice Build
- 5Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250