NJ State Courtrooms to Close With Mandatory Judge Training Scheduled
While the courts will remain open for the filing of cases and other business, there will be no court proceedings, including pretrial detention hearings, conducted on the day of the training.
October 09, 2019 at 04:16 PM
3 minute read
With the New Jersey Supreme Court recently mandating training for all state court judges to better handle sex assault and other sensitive issues, a daylong session will close state courtrooms later this month.
Chief Justice Stuart Rabner issued an order scheduling the "Judiciary Enhanced Education and Training Initiative" for judges to take place on Monday, Oct. 28.
While the courts will remain open for all other matters, including the filing of cases, Rabner said there will be no Superior Court proceedings, such as pretrial detention hearings, conducted that day, which will be treated as a weekend day or legal holiday.
Only "emergent matters" will be handled by designated emergent duty judges that day, Rabner said. Supreme Court justices, Tax Court judges and Appellate Division judges are all required to undergo the training.
Municipal courts will not be affected.
"Whereas on Monday, October 28, 2019 all Superior Court judges will be participating in the mandatory full-day educational conference referenced in Directive #14-19 (along with all Supreme Court justices, Appellate Division judges, and Tax Court judges) as part of the 'Judiciary Enhanced Education and Training Initiative'; and Whereas there thus will be no Superior Court proceedings conducted on that day other than emergent matters (which will be handled by the designated emergent duty judges), though the courts will remain open for all other purposes, including the filing of matters," read the order, dated Monday.
Judge Glenn Grant, acting administrative director of the courts, issued a notice appending the order. "For purposes of N.J.S.A. 2A:162-9d(1), Monday, October 28, 2019 shall be deemed as not being a 'working day' and instead shall be treated for those purposes the same as a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday," Grant wrote in the notice, dated Tuesday.
Directive #14-19, issued last July 17, announced the training program to focus on enhancing the "existing training for judges in the areas of sexual assault, domestic violence, implicit bias, and diversity." The initiative included incorporating a "mandatory full-day educational conference."
The directive came amid uproar over state court judges' handling of sexual assault cases.
In one such case, the state Supreme Court on July 17 announced it would consider the removal of Superior Court Judge John Russo Jr. from the bench for ethics violations in allegedly asking a rape victim if she tried to block her body parts or close her legs during the assault. That same day, Rabner issued a lengthy statement that, in part, announced that enhanced training for judges in dealing with sexual assault and domestic violence would be mandated.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSocial Media Policy for Judges Provides Guidance in a Changing World
3 minute readBank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
3 minute read'Something Really Bad Happened': J&J's Talc Bankruptcy Vote Under Attack
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 2Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
- 3Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250