NJ State Courtrooms to Close With Mandatory Judge Training Scheduled
While the courts will remain open for the filing of cases and other business, there will be no court proceedings, including pretrial detention hearings, conducted on the day of the training.
October 09, 2019 at 04:16 PM
3 minute read
With the New Jersey Supreme Court recently mandating training for all state court judges to better handle sex assault and other sensitive issues, a daylong session will close state courtrooms later this month.
Chief Justice Stuart Rabner issued an order scheduling the "Judiciary Enhanced Education and Training Initiative" for judges to take place on Monday, Oct. 28.
While the courts will remain open for all other matters, including the filing of cases, Rabner said there will be no Superior Court proceedings, such as pretrial detention hearings, conducted that day, which will be treated as a weekend day or legal holiday.
Only "emergent matters" will be handled by designated emergent duty judges that day, Rabner said. Supreme Court justices, Tax Court judges and Appellate Division judges are all required to undergo the training.
Municipal courts will not be affected.
"Whereas on Monday, October 28, 2019 all Superior Court judges will be participating in the mandatory full-day educational conference referenced in Directive #14-19 (along with all Supreme Court justices, Appellate Division judges, and Tax Court judges) as part of the 'Judiciary Enhanced Education and Training Initiative'; and Whereas there thus will be no Superior Court proceedings conducted on that day other than emergent matters (which will be handled by the designated emergent duty judges), though the courts will remain open for all other purposes, including the filing of matters," read the order, dated Monday.
Judge Glenn Grant, acting administrative director of the courts, issued a notice appending the order. "For purposes of N.J.S.A. 2A:162-9d(1), Monday, October 28, 2019 shall be deemed as not being a 'working day' and instead shall be treated for those purposes the same as a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday," Grant wrote in the notice, dated Tuesday.
Directive #14-19, issued last July 17, announced the training program to focus on enhancing the "existing training for judges in the areas of sexual assault, domestic violence, implicit bias, and diversity." The initiative included incorporating a "mandatory full-day educational conference."
The directive came amid uproar over state court judges' handling of sexual assault cases.
In one such case, the state Supreme Court on July 17 announced it would consider the removal of Superior Court Judge John Russo Jr. from the bench for ethics violations in allegedly asking a rape victim if she tried to block her body parts or close her legs during the assault. That same day, Rabner issued a lengthy statement that, in part, announced that enhanced training for judges in dealing with sexual assault and domestic violence would be mandated.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSocial Media Policy for Judges Provides Guidance in a Changing World
3 minute readBank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
3 minute read'Something Really Bad Happened': J&J's Talc Bankruptcy Vote Under Attack
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250