Daylong Judge Training to Shutter Municipal Courtrooms Dec. 9
State court judges completed their daylong training on Monday under the same directive.
November 01, 2019 at 09:52 AM
3 minute read
All of New Jersey's municipal courtrooms will be closed for the day on Monday, Dec. 9 for mandatory full-day training for judges in the areas of sexual assault, domestic violence and handling other sensitive matters.
There will be no proceedings conducted in any municipal court on that day due to distance and logistics, though the municipal courts will remain open that day on their regular schedules for all other purposes, according to Judge Glenn A. Grant, acting administrative director of the courts.
Grant signed the notice of the mandatory training date on Oct. 30.
The closure includes both daytime and evening court sessions, as the training will not conclude until the end of the business day on Dec. 9, the notice said.
Directive #14-19 was issued last July 17. It announced the "New Jersey Judiciary Enhanced Education and Training Initiative." The Initiative focuses on enhancing the "existing training for judges in the areas of sexual assault, domestic violence, implicit bias and diversity."
The directive indicated that there would be a "mandatory full-day educational conference" focusing on those areas.
State court judges completed their daylong training on Oct. 28 under the same directive. No Superior Court proceedings were conducted, other than emergent matters to be handled by the designated emergent duty judges. The courts did stay open for all other purposes.
Like municipal court, the mandatory training for state court judges was to gain a better understanding of ways to handle sexual assault and other sensitive issues before them.
The directive, issued by state Supreme Court Justice Stuart Rabner on behalf of the court, came after a series of high-profile incidents involving state court judges who were criticized as insensitive and out-of-touch in their remarks to alleged rape victims.
In one such case, the state Supreme Court on July 17 announced it would consider the removal of Superior Court Judge John Russo Jr. from the bench for ethics violations in allegedly asking a rape victim if she tried to block her body parts or close her legs during a sexual assault.
On the same day the Supreme Court announced Russo's possible removal from the bench, Rabner issued a lengthy statement that, in part, announced that enhanced training for judges in dealing with sexual assault, domestic violence, bias and diversity would be mandated.
Russo is fighting his potential removal and sought to have Rabner recuse from the matter based on the chief justice's July 17 statements, though the motion was denied.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSocial Media Policy for Judges Provides Guidance in a Changing World
3 minute readBank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
3 minute read'Something Really Bad Happened': J&J's Talc Bankruptcy Vote Under Attack
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-68
- 2Friday Newspaper
- 3Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 4Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 5NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250