BAR REPORT - Capitol Report
Lame duck kicks in with onslaught of legislation
November 18, 2019 at 08:03 AM
3 minute read
For lawmakers, the lame duck period (when an elected official or group continues to hold office during the period between the election and the inauguration of a successor) means trying to conduct the business of the Legislature in the condensed period of time in the last year of a two-year session. This year, bills reviewed by the New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) that are up for consideration range from fraudulent deed disclosures to representation of indigent plaintiffs in license suspension hearings for failure to pay child support. Here is a summary of last week's bills:
A Matter of Deeds S-1245(Rice)/A-4138 (Jones)
This bill requires that an affidavit of title be recorded with the deed and that the county recording officer notify the transferor any time a deed transfer is being recorded for his or her property. The NJSBA was concerned about the enforceability of an affidavit of title, which is not a standard form, and requested an amendment to remove this mandate, but to afford the opportunity to alert anyone who requests it a notification of any activity of the particular property. The bill was held. The NJSBA continues to monitor its progress.
Right to Vote A-5823 (Sumter)
The NJSBA supports this bill as a good first step towards expanding the right to vote to individuals who were previously unable to vote as a result of convictions and penalty status. It testified to the Assembly Appropriations Committee in support of this bill, along with several organizations, including the Garden State Bar Association and New Jersey Institute for Social Justice.
Arbitration Matters A-4972 (Moriarty)/S-1490 (Beach)
The NJSBA supported this bill with amendments that were made to expand the covered parties to include officers, directors, and controlling shareholders and/or partners, and to ensure that an indigent consumer who does not prevail is not on the hook for attorney's fees and costs in an arbitration. The bill was passed in the Senate Commerce Committee.
Annual Report Filing S-2938 (Turner)/A-4699 (Moriarty)
The NJSBA is generally supportive of this bill, which requires non-governmental entities providing annual report filing services to make certain disclosures when soliciting clients. The NJSBA asked for a friendly amendment to include in the definitions "non-profit corporations" so they are also protected from organizations that prey on business entities to charge more than the cost to file fees directly through the Department of Treasury. The bill requires certain disclosures and prohibits false representations that a recipient of an email is legally required to use its services in order to file an annual report. The bill passed the Senate Commerce Committee with the amendment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Attorney General's Office Announces Major Shake-Up for Executive Leadership Team
4 minute read'Bewitched by the Technology': $300K to Settle Faulty Facial Recognition
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250