Punitive Damages Vacated in Case of Paralegal Who Claimed to Have 'Expertise of an Attorney'
Despite upholding a lower court ruling, the panel still cut the judgment against Karmin Paralegal Services from $12,000 to $3,000 because punitive damages were not specifically pleaded in the complaint.
November 21, 2019 at 06:17 PM
4 minute read
A paralegal service committed fraud when it claimed to offer the expertise of an attorney at a lower price, a New Jersey appeals court ruled Friday.
Despite upholding a lower court ruling, the panel still cut the judgment against Karmin Paralegal Services from $12,000 to $3,000 because punitive damages were not specifically pleaded in the complaint.
Karmin Paralegal Services, owned by Alan Karmin, charged $3,000 to prepare court documents for John Baron in connection with a child support dispute. Karmin said "he had the expertise of an attorney, but he did not charge attorney fees," according to the Appellate Division ruling. Karmin also said the claim by Baron's ex-wife was "frivolous" because she could not assert jurisdiction over him in New Jersey when the divorce decree was entered in North Carolina.
Baron then represented himself in the case, but the Family Court judge ruled in favor of his ex-wife. An attorney that Baron consulted advised him Karmin performed "shoddy legal work."
Baron demanded a full refund, but Karmin refused. Karmin filed a police report against Baron for sending him harassing emails, and Baron reported Karmin to the Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law, which referred the matter to the Union County Prosecutor's Office. Charges were filed against Karmin, who entered a pretrial intervention program conditioned on payment of restitution.
Baron, again representing himself, also filed a lawsuit against Karmin Paralegal Services, which denied engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. After a bench trial, Superior Court Judge Robert Wilson in Bergen County ruled in September 2018 that Karmin Paralegal Service was engaging in the unauthorized practice of law by using the "euphemism of the document preparation agreement" and then "trying to hide behind the plaintiff, by making the plaintiff look like he's proceeding pro se."
Wilson ruled that Karmin Paralegal Services committed fraud by practicing law without a license. He awarded $3,000 in compensatory damages and $9,000 in punitive damages and also referred the case to the Union County Prosecutor's Office.
Karmin Paralegal Services appealed, disputing the determination that its services constituted fraud. Appellate Division judges Joseph Yannotti, Heidi Currier and Lisa Firko said the drafting of pleadings and other legal documents is clearly regarded as the practice of law. Karmin engaged in the practice of law without the benefit of a supervising attorney, and misrepresented to Baron that he had "the expertise of an attorney," the panel said. The judge below properly found that Karmin intended for Baron to rely on his advice, and sustained damages as a result, the panel said.
The panel also rejected Karmin's claim that the litigation was frivolous because Baron was "well aware that defendant is not an attorney." Baron made clear his intent was only to get his money back, and he only filed suit when Karmin refused to give him a full refund, the panel said.
But the panel sided with Karmin on his claim that the $12,000 judgment was excessive. Punitive damages can be awarded only if the plaintiff makes a showing that the defendant's acts or omissions were "actuated by actual malice or accompanied by a wanton and willful disregard of persons who might be harmed by those acts and omissions," the panel said.
Baron could not be reached for comment.
Karmin, who represented himself, said he was pleased the punitive damages were vacated. But Karmin was critical of the appeals court's finding that Baron was a credible witness.
"The court got mad because they don't want someone taking business away from attorneys," Karmin said.
Karmin Paralegal Services is no longer in operation and Karmin said he now works for "a number of lawyers," but he declined to name any.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNeighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?
7 minute readAn Overview of Proposed Changes to the Federal Rules of Procedure Relating to the Expansion of Remote Trial Testimony
15 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250