Take Action on Essex County's Judge Shortage
This is an emergency. We urge that partisanship and bickering be put to one side so that nominations can be considered and approved without further delay.
December 08, 2019 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
The president of the Essex County Bar Association recently issued an email "Call to Action." The email indicated that during the past year, the Superior Court of Essex County had over 113,000 new matters filed, the largest caseload in New Jersey. However, its last judicial appointment was over two years ago, and there are presently 12 unfilled seats and several announced retirements which will take place in the near future. Thus, it pointed out that Essex County will have 14 judicial vacancies representing about one-third of the current number of judges sitting in Essex County Superior Court. Given that Essex is the busiest vicinage in New Jersey, the situation is described as a judicial crisis.
There is no question that the present judges in Essex County are doing their very best under the aegis of the assignment judge to conduct the judicial affairs as efficiently as possible, placing emphasis obviously on the most sensitive or most emergent matters. Nonetheless, the situation is probably as dire as it has ever been in Essex County, and there is no question but that the effect of the judicial shortage is to cause long delays in the disposition of civil and criminal matters. The hardships visited upon litigants under these circumstances are palpably obvious. Of special note is the difficulty in the family court, where matters including such things as custody and visitation of children are often not resolved for unduly long periods of time through no fault of the judges assigned.
Accordingly, in the conclusion of the bar association's email it is said that, "TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE. PLEASE CALL/E-MAIL ESSEX COUNTY'S SENATOR'S AND THE GOVERNOR'S OFFICE RIGHT NOW."
Experience teaches that these matters are often replete with political considerations which sometimes cause inordinate delays. However, under the circumstances, we urge that partisanship and bickering between or among parties responsible for judicial appointments and the approval thereof should be put to one side. This is an emergency, and it is our understanding that there are a number of qualified applicants for judicial positions. It is absolutely necessary that where holdups exist because of personal or political considerations, those have to be put to one side so that nominations by the governor can be considered and approved without further delay. We echo the plea of the bar association.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetiring AOC Director Judge Glenn A. Grant Walks Away From Judiciary 'Tremendously Impressed' by New Jersey's Judges
5 minute readFederal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute read‘The Decision Will Help Others’: NJ Supreme Court Reverses Appellate Div. in OPRA Claim Over Body-Worn Camera Footage
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 2Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
- 3Sarno da Costa D’Aniello Maceri LLC Announces Addition of New Office in Eatontown, NJ, and Named Partner
- 4Friday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250