Take Action on Essex County's Judge Shortage
This is an emergency. We urge that partisanship and bickering be put to one side so that nominations can be considered and approved without further delay.
December 08, 2019 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
The president of the Essex County Bar Association recently issued an email "Call to Action." The email indicated that during the past year, the Superior Court of Essex County had over 113,000 new matters filed, the largest caseload in New Jersey. However, its last judicial appointment was over two years ago, and there are presently 12 unfilled seats and several announced retirements which will take place in the near future. Thus, it pointed out that Essex County will have 14 judicial vacancies representing about one-third of the current number of judges sitting in Essex County Superior Court. Given that Essex is the busiest vicinage in New Jersey, the situation is described as a judicial crisis.
There is no question that the present judges in Essex County are doing their very best under the aegis of the assignment judge to conduct the judicial affairs as efficiently as possible, placing emphasis obviously on the most sensitive or most emergent matters. Nonetheless, the situation is probably as dire as it has ever been in Essex County, and there is no question but that the effect of the judicial shortage is to cause long delays in the disposition of civil and criminal matters. The hardships visited upon litigants under these circumstances are palpably obvious. Of special note is the difficulty in the family court, where matters including such things as custody and visitation of children are often not resolved for unduly long periods of time through no fault of the judges assigned.
Accordingly, in the conclusion of the bar association's email it is said that, "TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE. PLEASE CALL/E-MAIL ESSEX COUNTY'S SENATOR'S AND THE GOVERNOR'S OFFICE RIGHT NOW."
Experience teaches that these matters are often replete with political considerations which sometimes cause inordinate delays. However, under the circumstances, we urge that partisanship and bickering between or among parties responsible for judicial appointments and the approval thereof should be put to one side. This is an emergency, and it is our understanding that there are a number of qualified applicants for judicial positions. It is absolutely necessary that where holdups exist because of personal or political considerations, those have to be put to one side so that nominations by the governor can be considered and approved without further delay. We echo the plea of the bar association.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeet the Judges: Senate Confirms 7 Superior Court Nominees in Final 2024 Session
3 minute readAG Had No Authority to Take Control of Paterson PD, Appellate Division Says
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 22024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
- 3What We Heard From Litigation Leaders in 2024
- 4Akin and Simpson Create New Practice Groups With Integrated Teams
- 5Thursday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250