Courtroom Ouster Highlights Need for Civility
The appellate court room is another place in which civility is required. It should be encouraged by all members of the bench and bar.
December 15, 2019 at 10:00 AM
2 minute read
We have listened to the oral argument in Doyle v Palmer before the Second Circuit, posted on the court's website. The case challenged the affidavit of character required for admission to the bar of the Eastern District of New York. In making his argument, counsel for appellant invited the panel to ask questions because he did not want to merely repeat the arguments in his brief. A judge asked why the appeal was brought because the plaintiff controlled the contents of the affidavit and could have declined to submit the affidavit that was filed. Counsel suggested that the judge did not understand his argument and asked the judge "are you serious?" The judge thereupon withdrew his question, and counsel sarcastically added "I see you read the briefs thoroughly." The attorney was told he was acting "disrespectfully and discourteously," and asked to sit down.
After the United States attorney made a short statement, appellant's counsel stood up again to make rebuttal but was told he had "waived it." He apparently continued to talk and refused to leave whereupon an officer was asked to escort him out of the courtroom. Even if the appellant's argument was that he could not amend the contents of the required affidavit, the statements of his attorney were unprofessional and inexcusable.
Many appeals can be argued by lawyers who tried the case or are familiar with the record; others should require attorneys with appellate experience or specialization. Many arguments justify a mere statement that counsel does not want to repeat the briefing and invite questions. Argument is a matter of right in our Appellate Division and scheduled on almost all appeals in the Supreme Court. Argument is a good opportunity to clear up issues in the record or answer questions or concerns the court may have. All require attorneys to be respectful, listen to the questions and give direct answers. We favor certification for appellate litigators just as the certification process has been developed in other areas, but in any event, the appellate court room is another place in which civility is required. It should be encouraged by all members of the bench and bar.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSocial Media Policy for Judges Provides Guidance in a Changing World
3 minute readBank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
3 minute read'Something Really Bad Happened': J&J's Talc Bankruptcy Vote Under Attack
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250