Appeals Court OKs Listing Medmal Defendants' Names in Attachment to Complaint
The appeals court said a plaintiff, rather than listing all defendants' names in the complaint, may adopt by reference a list attached to the complaint.
December 18, 2019 at 04:21 PM
3 minute read
A New Jersey appeals court has ruled that a group of doctors and nurses had sufficient notice of a medical malpractice lawsuit against them even though they were named in an attached document and not the initial complaint.
A subsequent, amended complaint in the case included the names of the individual defendants but it was filed days after the two-year statute of limitations ran out. Superior Court Judge Mark Ciarrocca dismissed registered nurses Nicole Drago and Maurice Prior, and physicians Clarke Goodman and Jeffrey Goldman from the case, accepting their contention that they were not named as defendants in the initial, timely complaint.
But the appeals court said a plaintiff, rather than listing all defendants named in the complaint, may adopt by reference a list attached to the complaint.
Reading the complaint "indulgently" in order "to ascertain whether the fundament of a cause of action may be gleaned," and applying "liberality," Appellate Division Judges Carmen Messano, Mitchel Ostrer and Francis Vernoia said the doctors and nurses were properly named as defendants.
The plaintiff, Emmanuel Lewis, claimed in the suit that his father, Milton Lewis, died after personnel at Trinitas Regional Medical Center in Elizabeth failed to determine he suffered a stroke and failed to administer appropriate treatment.
The elder Lewis was admitted to the hospital on October 2016 and died there six days later.
On Oct. 9, 2018, Emmanuel Lewis filed a pro se complaint using a form from the state Judiciary's website. In the space for listing defendants, he typed in "Trinitas Regional Medical Center" and also wrote in longhand "please see attachments."
Lewis attached a letter from Union County Surrogate James LaCorte, granting him administration ad prosequendum for the purpose of bringing a claim on behalf of his late father against Trinitas, physicians Goodman and Goldman, and four registered nurses, including Drago and Prior.
Goodman, Goldman, Drago and Prior moved to dismiss on statute of limitation grounds. The other nurse defendants did not join in the motion and were not parties to the appeal.
The appeals court took judicial notice that the civil complaint form Lewis found on the judiciary website's "self-help center" includes only two lines for the defendants' names. Court rules require that a complaint include the names and addresses of all parties, but the rules also permit a party to adopt by reference an attachment to a pleading, the appeals court said.
Teaneck lawyer Tayo Bland began representing Lewis and the estate in April. He did not return a call about the ruling. Defense lawyers in the case—Maxwell Billek of Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, representing Goodman; Kenneth Brown of Weber Gallagher, representing Goldman; and Michael Ricciardulli of Ruprecht Hart Ricciardulli & Sherman, representing Drago and Prior—did not respond to requests for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All$10 Million Settlement Reached for Baby Injured by Disconnected Ventilator
3 minute readJury Awards Horizon $2.4 Million for Fraudulent Billing Against 3 NJ Health Care Providers
2 minute readVirtua Drug Tests Pregnancy Patients Without Consent, NJ Attorney General Alleges in New Suit
3 minute readNJ Supreme Court Considers Ability to Add Nonparty Doctors to Med Mal Verdict Sheets
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 2Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 3Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
- 4'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
- 5Class Action Filed Against Houston Health Savings Account Firm for Allegedly Confiscating Client Funds
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250