Appeals Court OKs Listing Medmal Defendants' Names in Attachment to Complaint
The appeals court said a plaintiff, rather than listing all defendants' names in the complaint, may adopt by reference a list attached to the complaint.
December 18, 2019 at 04:21 PM
3 minute read
A New Jersey appeals court has ruled that a group of doctors and nurses had sufficient notice of a medical malpractice lawsuit against them even though they were named in an attached document and not the initial complaint.
A subsequent, amended complaint in the case included the names of the individual defendants but it was filed days after the two-year statute of limitations ran out. Superior Court Judge Mark Ciarrocca dismissed registered nurses Nicole Drago and Maurice Prior, and physicians Clarke Goodman and Jeffrey Goldman from the case, accepting their contention that they were not named as defendants in the initial, timely complaint.
But the appeals court said a plaintiff, rather than listing all defendants named in the complaint, may adopt by reference a list attached to the complaint.
Reading the complaint "indulgently" in order "to ascertain whether the fundament of a cause of action may be gleaned," and applying "liberality," Appellate Division Judges Carmen Messano, Mitchel Ostrer and Francis Vernoia said the doctors and nurses were properly named as defendants.
The plaintiff, Emmanuel Lewis, claimed in the suit that his father, Milton Lewis, died after personnel at Trinitas Regional Medical Center in Elizabeth failed to determine he suffered a stroke and failed to administer appropriate treatment.
The elder Lewis was admitted to the hospital on October 2016 and died there six days later.
On Oct. 9, 2018, Emmanuel Lewis filed a pro se complaint using a form from the state Judiciary's website. In the space for listing defendants, he typed in "Trinitas Regional Medical Center" and also wrote in longhand "please see attachments."
Lewis attached a letter from Union County Surrogate James LaCorte, granting him administration ad prosequendum for the purpose of bringing a claim on behalf of his late father against Trinitas, physicians Goodman and Goldman, and four registered nurses, including Drago and Prior.
Goodman, Goldman, Drago and Prior moved to dismiss on statute of limitation grounds. The other nurse defendants did not join in the motion and were not parties to the appeal.
The appeals court took judicial notice that the civil complaint form Lewis found on the judiciary website's "self-help center" includes only two lines for the defendants' names. Court rules require that a complaint include the names and addresses of all parties, but the rules also permit a party to adopt by reference an attachment to a pleading, the appeals court said.
Teaneck lawyer Tayo Bland began representing Lewis and the estate in April. He did not return a call about the ruling. Defense lawyers in the case—Maxwell Billek of Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, representing Goodman; Kenneth Brown of Weber Gallagher, representing Goldman; and Michael Ricciardulli of Ruprecht Hart Ricciardulli & Sherman, representing Drago and Prior—did not respond to requests for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Supreme Court Clarifies Affidavit of Merit Requirement for Doctor With Dual Specialties
4 minute readArbitrators Under Fire for Allegedly Forcing Workers to 'Stay or Pay' Employers
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 2Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 3Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 4Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 5Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firm's Innovation Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250