'Toys 'R' Us Bill' Sizes Up Prelayoff Notice, Severance Pay
The measure, which recently passed the Senate, seeks to amend the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act and was prompted by the bankruptcy of Toys "R" Us.
December 18, 2019 at 11:28 AM
3 minute read
A bill aimed at protecting workers' rights by giving employees affected by corporate bankruptcies and closures more prelayoff notification time and severance pay cleared the Senate on Monday.
Lawmakers in the upper chamber passed S-3170, nicknamed the "Toys 'R' Us Bill" since its sponsors say the bankrupt retail chain was an impetus for it, by a 27-13 vote during the final voting session of this year.
The Assembly has yet to schedule its Assembly counterpart, A-5145, for a full floor vote, though a floor amendment to the bill received the lower house's approval in a vote, also on Monday.
S-3170 would increase the minimum number of days of notice from 60 to 90 that employers of 100 or more full-time employees must give to employees when there is a mass layoff, plant closing or transfer that will result in 50 or more employees losing their jobs, according to a release outlining the bill.
Layoff notices filed with the state are required under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, or WARN. The notices must be issued to employees in advance of potential large-scale layoffs and often do not represent the final number of job losses.
The measure also would require severance pay equal to one week for each year of service, regardless of whether the employer provides required notice. The severance would be "earned in full" upon the termination of employment, according to the bill.
Primary sponsors Sen. Joe Cryan, D-Union, and Sen. Nellie Pou, D-Passaic, said they drafted the measure in response to the recent spate of business closings and bankruptcies, in particular retailer Toys "R" Us, which closed operations at its Wayne headquarters and Flanders distribution center, resulting in 2,028 lost jobs. Mired in heavy debt caused by a buyout in 2005 and pounded by competition from Amazon, Target and Walmart, among others, Toys "R" Us declared bankruptcy in July 2019. News reports had the company owing more than $5 billion.
"Companies have exploited bankruptcy laws to protect their profits while workers lose their jobs and severance pay," Cryan said in a statement after the Senate vote Monday. "Employees shouldn't be left in the dark as companies are pillaged for their resources after equity firms load them down with debt and the top officials walk away with bonuses. The law needs to be upgraded to better protect the rights of the workers."
"In this and other cases, the bankrupt companies were purchased by private equity firms that imposed massive layoffs while top executives walked away with millions of dollars in bonuses," Cryan added.
S-3170 also would:
- Require additional severance of four weeks of pay, if an employer fails to meet the 90-day notice requirement;
- Include retail operations where employees are more decentralized across many smaller locations; and
- Extend to all employees instead of only full-time staff.
"In the event of corporate losses and bankruptcies, the first people to think of, the first people to protect, must be the employees," said Pou in a statement. "When Toys R Us went under, they left their employees out in the cold with next to no paycheck or lead time to prepare while the executives divvied up massive bonuses."
S-3170 passed the Senate Budget Committee by a 9-4 vote on Dec. 5, while A-5145 was reported out of the Assembly Labor Committee with amendments on Dec. 9 by a 6-2-1 vote.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250