Litigant's 'Vengeful' Lawsuit Ends in $45K Sanction
Judge Vito Bianco ultimately found the underlying lawsuit was filed to extract extract vengeance against a tax assessor.
December 19, 2019 at 05:45 PM
4 minute read
A New Jersey tax judge has imposed a $45,000 sanction on a litigant who filed a lawsuit seeking an increase in a tax assessor's own property tax assessment.
Judge Vito Bianco of the New Jersey Tax Court ultimately found Jesse Wolosky brought the case to extract vengeance against tax assessor Penny Holenstein for not giving him the outcome he wanted in a settlement of his own property tax appeal. Wolosky's lawsuit claimed Holstein's home was under-assessed.
Bianco imposed a $45,589 sanction on Wolosky, which covers the cost of Holenstein's legal fees and expenses.
The case balanced the extent to which an individual may exercise his right under law to challenge another property owner's assessment against the obligation of a public official "to perform her duties without fear, intimidation or coercion," Bianco said.
Wolosky brought the suit "under the guise of public activism," but he was acting "for his own selfish and vengeful interests," Bianco said.
Wolosky's lawyer, Walter Luers, said an appeal is planned. Court rules require a frivolous litigation sanctions motion to be filed within 20 days of the entry of final judgment, but in the present case the motion for sanctions was filed 679 days after final judgment, Luers said.
"It looks like they're throwing the book at Mr. Wolosky but the defendants in this case totally failed to follow the rules," Luers said.
Wolosky appealed the assessment of his property in Green Township to the county Board of Taxation in 2013. Holenstein, in her capacity as assessor to Green Township, negotiated a settlement lowering Wolosky's assessment to $8,100. Holenstein also holds part-time posts as assessor in two other townships, Byram and Stillwater.
In March 2015, Wolosky sought to lower the assessment on his property to $1,000, and Holenstein countered with $1,500. Wolosky rejected that offer and asked for $700, which Holenstein refused.
In May 2015, Wolosky filed a series of public record requests with Green Township and Byram Township concerning Holenstein, including her resume, employment application, tax assessor certificate and any continuing education courses she took.
In June 2015, the County Board of Taxation rejected Wolosky's appeal of his assessment. At that hearing, Wolosky turned to the municipal attorney for Green Township, Richard Stein, and threatened to file a similar tax appeal on his home and another appeal on Holenstein's. Holenstein's husband, Michael, later testified he heard Wolosky tell a board of taxation employee he intended to file tax appeals on Stein and Holenstein to "cause them agita."
In July 2015, Wolosky went to the Byram Township municipal building and questioned deputy clerk Cindy Church about Holenstein's work hours. Told that Holenstein works in Byram on Tuesdays, Wolosky told Church "she made things difficult for me in Green Township, and so now I'm going to make things difficult for her."
Wolosky filed another appeal of the assessment on Holenstein's residence in Fredon Township in March 2016. He also filed an open record request with Stillwater Township, seeking Holenstein's payroll information. In May 2016, the county board dismissed Wolosky's application, citing a perceived conflict because of Holenstein's work as an assessor.
Bianco, citing Wolosky's statements and the timing of his open record requests, found Wolosky cast "serious doubt about the credibility of his testimony with regard to his motivations." Bianco also said Wolosky, who was pro se when he filed both appeals of Holenstein's assessment, acted in bad faith at all times.
Because Wolosky's litigation was brought against Holenstein due to her official duties for Green Township, and an ordinance calls for the township to provide for her defense, the township is eligible for reimbursement as a public entity under the frivolous lawsuit statute, Bianco said.
Holenstein's attorney, Tara St. Angelo of Gebhardt & Kiefer in Annandale, billed 268.8 hours at $175 per hour. Costs and paralegal fees amounted to another $4,368, for a total of $52,983. Bianco deducted $6,151 from the total request to reflect that Wolosky successfully defended against Holenstein's motion for dismissal in 2016.
Since $12,302 was billed for preparation of that motion as well as a motion for limited discovery, upon which Holenstein prevailed, the judge deducted half the cost for preparing the motion. The judge also deducted $1,242 in fees for responding to and redacting confidential information from open record requests by Wolosky, because he had the right to make those requests, the judge said.
St. Angelo declined to comment. The lawyer for Fredon Township, William Hinkes of Hollander, Strelzik, Pasculli, Hinkes, Wojcik, Gacquin, Vandenberg & Hontz in Newton, did not return a call.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘The Decision Will Help Others’: NJ Supreme Court Reverses Appellate Div. in OPRA Claim Over Body-Worn Camera Footage
5 minute readLongtime AOC Director Glenn Grant to Step Down, Assignment Judge to Take Over
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250