Don't Let Judicial Vacancies Delay Child Sex Abuse Cases
To make the long-delayed promise of judicial relief for victims of childhood sexual abuse real, we renew our strong encouragement to confirm qualified judicial candidates.
December 22, 2019 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
We applaud the legislature and governor for enacting legislation to open a "window" in the statute of limitations to permit victims of childhood sexual abuse to seek justice in our courts. This new law, which took effect on Dec. 1, modified the preexisting two-year statute of limitations to provide a two-year period for victims who are otherwise barred to file their cases. Further, it amends the Charitable Immunity Act to permit claims of willful abuse by nonprofit organizations within seven years from discovery of the damage from the abuse, or age 55, whichever is later, and claims for ordinary negligence in hiring and supervision of employees. The law also amends the Tort Claims Act to eliminate immunity for sexual abuse lawsuits. It does, however, prohibit class actions or class settlements. Cases will have to be brought individually.
Subject to the constitutional limits on our courts' personal jurisdiction, and our choice-of-law rules, a number of cases from out-of-state plaintiffs have already been filed here. According to some of the complaints, cases of abuse took place on weekend or holiday trips when alleged abusers brought children from other states to New Jersey. A number of these cases come from Pennsylvania, where the legislature has refused to enact statutory relief, and after years of delay has rather embarked on a cumbersome process to amend their constitution to provide a remedy. There are also a number of strictly New Jersey cases that are being filed. More than 50 cases were filed the first day the new law took effect. In New York, which opened a one-year window, over 1,100 cases have been filed.
In any event, the welcome and overdue opportunity for both New Jersey and at least some out-of-state victims to seek judicial relief in our courts for their damages may be frustrated by the backlogs in our courts caused by the dangerous level of unfilled vacancies in our judiciary. We have recently editorialized on this impending or already-existing crisis, "Take Action on Essex County's Judge Shortage," 225 N.J.L.J. 3214 (Dec. 9, 2019), which will only be made worse as these new litigants bring their cases to our overcrowded courts. As the old saying goes "Justice delayed is justice denied." The Senate's recent confirmation of three new Superior Court judges will make only a small dent in the problem. We are experiencing one of the weak spots in our otherwise admirable appointive judicial system.
For this additional reason, to make the long-delayed promise of judicial relief for victims of childhood sexual abuse real, we renew our strong encouragement to all the political actors in Trenton to think of these, and all the other deserving litigants on both sides of controversies, and to act to confirm qualified judicial candidates. Timely and effective resolution of litigated controversies is an important and necessary government service to which people in New Jersey are entitled.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSocial Media Policy for Judges Provides Guidance in a Changing World
3 minute readBank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
3 minute read'Something Really Bad Happened': J&J's Talc Bankruptcy Vote Under Attack
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250