Marijuana Expungement Law an Important First Step
We commend the members of the legislative and executive branches for working together, despite the complexity, to take this next important step in reforming our criminal justice system.
January 05, 2020 at 09:00 AM
2 minute read
It is common knowledge that the direct and collateral consequences of marijuana convictions have a major disparate impact on minorities. Reportedly New Jersey's arrest rate for marijuana offenses is among the highest in the nation (almost 1 million since 1990), and our expungement process is among the most cumbersome. We recognize that this is a bad combination for New Jersey.
The governor (consistent with one of his campaign promises) and both houses of the Legislature have agreed, in general, that now is the time to do something to ameliorate this unfair situation with respect to marijuana convictions as well as other convictions. Clearly, addressing this matter did not need to wait for the referendum on the proposed constitutional amendment legalizing recreational marijuana.
The governor had conditionally vetoed a bill passed by the Legislature this summer that provided for shortened waiting periods, funding for implementation, and streamlined expungement. He expressed concern about administrability, and requested language that legislators believed would unduly limit coverage. He also requested automatic expungement of convictions for those with a 10-year clean record and judicial sealing of low-level marijuana convictions.
The reform process is complicated because of, among other things, variations among local courts, the absence of statewide computer access to their records, and the need to notify the different levels of law enforcement. There will be thousands of people eligible for the new forms of expungement.
New legislation providing important reforms to the expungement process generally, incorporating most of the earlier proposals, but also including most of the governor's suggestions was passed and signed the week before Christmas. S-4154. It includes the creation of a task force to study and make recommendations for an automatic system to expunge all eligible 10-year-old offenses.
We commend the members of the legislative and executive branches for working together, despite the complexity, to take this next important step in reforming our criminal justice system.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetiring AOC Director Judge Glenn A. Grant Walks Away From Judiciary 'Tremendously Impressed' by New Jersey's Judges
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Indian Law Firm Cyril Amarchand Rolls Out AI Strategy, Adopts Suite of AI Tools
- 2Which Legal Tech Jobs Are on the Rise, and Which Aren't, with Jared Coseglia
- 3Absent Explicit Agreement, Court Rejects Unilateral Responsiveness Redaction of Text Messages
- 4SEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration
- 5Sidley Hires Paul Hastings Energy Finance Partner in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250