Anti-Hazing Bills With Tougher Penalties Head to Full Senate
Legislation spurred by the hazing-related death of a Penn State University student in 2017 passed the Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee Monday.
January 06, 2020 at 09:51 PM
4 minute read
A pair of measures spurred by the hazing-related death of a Penn State University student in 2017 that would elevate penalties for hazing resulting in bodily injury at colleges and schools passed the Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee on Monday.
The two bills, S-3150 and S-3628, were voted out of committee at the same time Monday, receiving a 12-0 vote during the two-hour hearing in Trenton where lawmakers reviewed more than 50 other measures for passage. They now head to the full Senate for a floor vote. Sponsors say the bills are aimed at cracking down on dangerous ritual activities often associated with Greek fraternity life at college campuses.
S-3150 would make hazing-related activities that result in serious bodily injury a third-degree criminal offense, and those that cause simple injury would go from a disorderly persons offense to a fourth-degree criminal charge. S-3628 would expand the scope of hazing activities that amount to criminal activity.
"When our kids go to college, they should have the right to live and learn in a safe environment without fear," Sen. Kip Bateman, R-Somerset, prime sponsor of S-3150, said in a statement. "Parents who send their children off to school should demand no less. Unless we explicitly prohibit the deep-rooted custom of hazing, more families will suffer."
"For too long, hazing has been used as a rite of passage into college fraternities and sororities. It is dangerous, it is irresponsible, and tragically, it is sometimes deadly," added Sen. Troy Singleton, D-Burlington, primary sponsor of S-3628, in the same release. "If students are found guilty of hazing another student, they should fully understand the seriousness of this illegal practice and what's at stake. If we want students to stop hazing, there needs to be real consequences for their actions."
S-3628 also expands the list of activities that constitute hazing and establishes immunity for an individual who reports hazing to emergency services, remains on the scene, and cooperates with responders.
S-3150, known as the "Timothy J. Piazza Law," is named for the Penn State University sophomore from Readington who died during a fraternity hazing incident at the on-campus Beta Theta Pi fraternity house in early 2017. An investigation determined Piazza was pressured into consuming 18 alcoholic drinks in 90 minutes Feb. 2, 2017. He died two days later.
As a result of that, Bateman said his bill also clarifies that prohibited conduct includes causing, coercing or forcing consumption of alcohol or drugs.
"Students must understand that hazing is a crime, and there are serious, life-altering consequences for engaging in such malicious and depraved behavior," Bateman said. "This law will be a strong deterrent to ensure college kids get that message."
Since their son's death, Evelyn Piazza, 51, and Jim Piazza, 58, have made it their personal mission to make hazing a felony at colleges throughout the country to deter it.
The couple testified in Trenton last September and stood alongside Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf when he signed that state's anti-hazing bill into law in Harrisburg on Oct. 19, 2018. In Pennsylvania, the law is known as the "Timothy J. Piazza Anti-Hazing Law," or "Tim's Law."
S-3150 previously passed the New Jersey Senate Judiciary Committee by an 8-0 vote on Sept 10, 2019. Singleton's separate bill, S-3628, which calls for adopting anti-hazing policies at colleges, high schools and middle schools, and would expand the activities encompassing criminal hazing, has a broader reach and definition of hazing compared with S-3150 and was held for a later hearing date. On Nov. 11, 2019, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 11-0 to pass it.
A-4728, the Assembly version of S-3150, is sponsored by Assemblyman Louis Greenwald, D-Camden, Assemblywoman Carol Murphy, D-Burlington, Assemblyman Roy Freiman, D-Somerset, and Assemblyman John Armato, D-Atlantic. It was referred to the Assembly Law and Public Safety Committee and has yet to be scheduled for a hearing.
A-5273, the Assembly version of S-3628, was introduced May 13, 2019, and referred to the Assembly Education Committee, where it is yet to be heard.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Attorney General's Office Announces Major Shake-Up for Executive Leadership Team
4 minute read'Bewitched by the Technology': $300K to Settle Faulty Facial Recognition
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250