Bill to Strengthen Attorney General's Authority Under the LAD Gains Traction
"This just creates equity for a class of people who will not necessarily pursue action on their own behalf," Sen. Teresa Ruiz said.
January 10, 2020 at 10:45 AM
4 minute read
A bill that would give the state Attorney General's Office and director of the Division on Civil Rights the authority to initiate Superior Court actions on matters that they believe are in violation of New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination passed the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday.
In such cases where no plaintiff has filed suit, it would be up to the AG and director of the division whether to move forward on litigation, according to the measure.
The measure reaffirms their authority to enforce the LAD, said the bill's primary sponsors: Sens. Loretta Weinberg, D-Bergen, Teresa Ruiz, D-Essex, and Sandra Cunningham, D-Hudson.
S-3878 passed the Senate Judiciary Committee by an 8-2 vote, with one abstention.
The Assembly version, A-5394, sponsored by Assemblyman Paul Moriarty, D-Gloucester/Camden, and Angela McNight, D-Hudson, passed the Assembly State and Local Government Committee on Dec. 9, 2019, by a 4-0 vote with one abstention. It has yet to be scheduled for a full Assembly vote.
"We have a very strong Law Against Discrimination in New Jersey," Weinberg, the Senate Majority Leader and member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said during a recess in the Senate's voting session on Thursday. "We've got constitutional protections, and we want to make sure that they're done clearly, and I think this bill will help."
Weinberg said S-3878 would provide for proactive steps to enforce and protect the civil rights of the state's residents.
The bill clarifies that prevailing plaintiffs in a Superior Court action under the LAD may seek and obtain the same injunctive relief that the director may award in an administrative proceeding under that law.
Additionally, the measure clarifies that the attorney general or director may seek and obtain penalties authorized under the LAD, or alternatively, punitive damages "payable to the state."
The bill also would mandate an award of attorney fees, and litigation and investigation costs, in Superior Court actions under the LAD if the attorney general or the director is the prevailing plaintiff. "Under current law, any prevailing party in a LAD action may be awarded, but is not ensured, a reasonable attorney's fee," the bill's statement says.
The bill also revises the LAD section authorizing Superior Court actions against local governments for discriminatory land use or housing regulations, providing that such actions may be brought by the attorney general or the director.
Ruiz said she was struck by an article she read last year about Pine Valley—a town made up largely of a golf course, and the second-smallest municipality in New Jersey—that allows only men to be members and buy homes there. Women are barred from owning homes and can only golf there on Sunday afternoons. The article, titled, "Inside NJ's exclusive, tiny town where only men who golf can own homes," appeared on nj.com last January.
"This seems so archaic and doesn't make sense," Ruiz said. "After reading that story, I just felt like it was 1896. I can't believe it was happening here in this state."
Ruiz said she called the AG's office and asked what she could do, and she decided to craft legislation.
The AG and Division on Civil Rights director "can't litigate something unless there's someone [a private plaintiff] who brings it on," said Ruiz during Thursday's Senate voting session. "With this piece of legislation, it would allow the office to bring litigation in cases like this so the state can actually pursue it."
"This allows the AG office to initiate action, which will be helpful in many other cases," Ruiz added. "This just creates equity for a class of people who will not necessarily pursue action on their own behalf, but if the attorney general sees that there's some inequity that's occurring that they will take action on behalf of those disenfranchised communities."
S-3878 would also revise the provision of the LAD authorizing the award of certain penalties to reflect the possibility that those penalties may be awarded by the Superior Court, not only in administrative proceedings.
Remedies could be sought by the government on behalf of victims, the measure provides.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250