BAR REPORT - Capitol Report
State bar tracks key measures in Trenton
January 13, 2020 at 08:01 AM
4 minute read
Lame duck legislative session plows forward; NJSBA tracks key measures in Trenton this week
As the end of the lame duck legislative session drew to a close, the New Jersey State Bar Association (NJSBA) weighed in on auto insurance, child support and other issues.
NJSBA sounds off on bill to end insurance fraud
The NJSBA voiced significant concerns in testimony on a bill that would overturn the New Jersey Supreme Court's decision placing liability for claims by an innocent third party on an insurance company that underwrites a fraudulent policy. S-1732 (Cryan)/A-2092 (Lagana) sets out to clarify that a violation of the New Jersey Insurance Fraud Prevention Act results in the loss of motor vehicle liability insurance coverage, and that innocent persons who are injured have recourse under uninsured motorist coverage or from the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund. If passed, the bill would allow insurance companies to disclaim coverage for fraud and turn away innocent third parties to collect from these other two funds.
The bill is a response to the New Jersey Supreme Court's 2015 decision in Citizens United Reciprocal Exchange v. Perez, 233 N.J. 143, 151 (2015). In that case, the Court reaffirmed the notion that an insurer does not escape liability to innocent third-party members of the public whose protection is a paramount concern of the no-fault system, even when the policy is rescinded due to material misrepresentations of the insured.
NJSBA Trustee Craig Hubert testified before the Assembly Financial Institutions and Insurance Committee to voice the NJSBA's opinion that the legislation would penalize an innocent passenger or person injured by the driver of an automobile as a result of the fraudulent actions of individuals over whom they had no control.
The bill was voted out of committee and awaits a vote in the Senate and Assembly.
Higher Education Citizenship Equality Act heads to governor's desk
The Senate voted out a bill that would provide equal access to college opportunities for New Jersey students who are citizens, but whose parents are undocumented. The NJSBA supported A-3836 (Gusciora)/S-700 (Ruiz), which would make students who are classified as dependents eligible for in-state tuition and financial aid such as scholarships, loans, and grants, if they meet certain criteria.
The NJSBA recommended an amendment to follow federal guidelines in clarifying that non-citizens who can provide evidence from the Immigration and Naturalization Service that they are in the United States for reasons other than a temporary purpose, with the intention of becoming a citizen or permanent resident, are eligible as well, if they meet the other criteria enunciated in the bill for the benefits described.
The bill awaits the governor's signature.
Filial responsibility bill heads to governor
The NJSBA supported S-2802 (Diegnan), which would repeal filial responsibility laws in New Jersey.
Filial responsibility laws were enacted in 45 states based on the colonial idea that children should be responsible for their parents. Since then, federal benefits such as Medicaid and Medicare, which provide basic medical care for seniors, regardless of financial standing, have been enacted. Federal law also prohibits states from considering any individual other than a person's spouse when determining their eligibility for these assistance programs. Similarly, long-term care facilities are prohibited from requiring third-party payment as a condition of a person's admission.
The NJSBA believes this legislation would eliminate confusion caused by these outdated federal statutes and allow practitioners to clearly and unequivocally advise clients about their rights and responsibilities in seeking appropriate care for a parent or spouse in need of assistance.
Community service bill awaits governor's sign-off
S-3332 (Rice)/A-1988 (McKeon) would establish programs that allow certain applicants to perform community service instead of paying motor vehicle surcharges. Eligible applicants would have to be unemployed, be determined to be financially unable to pay the motor vehicle surcharge, and be enrolled in a job training or education program.
The NJSBA supported the legislation because it believes it provides fairness to those who have limited financial means to pay motor vehicle surcharges.
Khayla Dixon and Hayley Slusser contributed to this report.
This is a status report provided by the New Jersey State Bar Association on recently passed and pending legislation, regulations, gubernatorial nominations and/or appointments of interest to lawyers, as well as the involvement of the NJSBA as amicus in appellate court matters. To learn more, visit njsba.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIn 2-1 Ruling, Court Clears Way for Decade-Old Wrongful Imprisonment Suit
5 minute readSo Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250