Suit Seeks Recognition of Other States' Concealed Weapon Court Orders
A suit claims New Jersey is obligated under the U.S. Constitution's Full Faith and Credit Clause to honor the out-of-state court orders allowing plaintiffs to carry guns.
January 15, 2020 at 06:40 PM
4 minute read
A federal lawsuit seeks to compel New jersey to recognize judicial orders from other states allowing their residents to carry concealed weapons.
The suit was filed by Delaware and Georgia residents who say they avoid visiting New Jersey out of fear of prosecution and incarceration for carrying a concealed firearm. New Jersey law does not recognize permits issued by other states to carry firearms, the suit says. No exemption is afforded to out-of-state travelers who possess a handgun in a hotel or other overnight accommodation.
New Jersey is obligated under the U.S. Constitution's Full Faith and Credit Clause to honor the out-of-state court orders allowing plaintiffs to carry guns, the suit claims. But New Jersey is one of a handful of states that does not honor concealed carry permits from other states.
The Full Faith and Credit Clause concerns state's obligations to respect the public acts, records and judicial proceedings of other states. Exceptions and limitations have been recognized, including a public policy exception.
Eatontown attorney Evan Nappen represents plaintiffs Charles McDowell of Georgia and Thomas Muller of Delaware. He said those states, like New Jersey, grant permits to carry concealed weapons through judicial orders.
"It's an act by the court of judicial consequence. Judges are not simply bureaucratic administrators—these are judicial acts," said Nappen.
The lawsuit seeks a declaration that the court orders from Delaware and Georgia should have the same effect as a permit to carry issued by New Jersey. The suit also seeks an injunction against the prosecution or arrest of people who have a permit issued by another state.
McDowell was granted a license to carry a weapon in 2017 by the Probate Court of Houston County in Georgia. Muller obtained a court order in the Superior Court of New Castle County, Delaware, in 2016.
Both men regularly carry a pistol to defend themselves and their families, the suit states. They would like to visit New Jersey but have refrained from doing so because of the nature of the state's gun laws, according to the suit.
"If this is successful, this will be the first time New Jersey will be required to recognize any other state's license," Nappen said.
Nappen, asked about the public policy exception, declined to discuss how he will address that issue, but said, "I am very confident that we can wage a public policy argument that favors the Second Amendment."
Asked about District of Columbia v. Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court opinion establishing an individual right to gun ownership, in which Justice Antonin Scalia noted that courts have upheld restrictions on concealed carry since the 19th century, Nappen said that ruling was favorable to the Second Amendment. He added he is hopeful for a favorable ruling from the Supreme Court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. City of New York, another gun rights case that could bolster his.
The named defendants are Attorney General Gurbir Grewal, state police Superintendent Patrick Callahan and the 21 county prosecutors.
Nappen says he knows of no other litigation asking a state to recognize a license to carry that was issued by a court in another state. Congress considered a bill in 2017 that would have required states to recognize concealed carry permits issued by other states. That bill, the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act, passed the House by a vote of 231-198, but stalled in the Senate.
Nappen said a new version of the same bill is now pending in Congress and that his suit does not reach as far as the bill.
The plaintiffs cite the case of Shaneen Allen, a Philadelphia woman who was arrested and jailed for 48 days on a gun charge after a 2013 traffic stop in Atlantic County, as illustrative of the current law's reach. Allen, who had a permit to carry a firearm in Pennsylvania, said she wrongly assumed it applied in other states. She faced three years in prison but was admitted to a diversionary program and then pardoned by Gov. Chris Christie in 2015. Allen has since become active in a movement for reciprocal recognition of state laws governing concealed firearms.
A spokesman for the attorney general declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Attorney General's Office Announces Major Shake-Up for Executive Leadership Team
4 minute read'Bewitched by the Technology': $300K to Settle Faulty Facial Recognition
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250