Legislation to Regulate Arbitrators Now Law
"It is overtly advantageous for companies involved in arbitration proceedings to have the ability to choose a private arbitrator," Sen. Nicholas Scutari, a bill cosponsor and attorney, said.
January 22, 2020 at 06:35 PM
3 minute read
A measure seeking to establish certain consumer protections in arbitration, including curtailing the threat of fee shifting and weeding out conflicts of interest, was signed into law by Gov. Phil Murphy on Wednesday.
The law is intended to prevent arbitration organizations from administering cases in which the organization has, or has had, a financial interest. It applies to any arbitration administrator who provides services for disputes that result in mandatory arbitration between a consumer and a company.
"It is overtly advantageous for companies involved in arbitration proceedings to have the ability to choose a private arbitrator," Sen. Nicholas Scutari, D-Union, who co-sponsored S-1490 with Sen. James Beach, D-Burlington/Camden, said in a release Wednesday. Scutari is an attorney and chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee.
"An arbitrator should not have a financial interest at stake while administrating a proceeding and this law provides needed transparency in situations pertaining to consumer protections," Scutari said.
The legislation states: "Under New Jersey's current law, there are rules governing arbitrators and arbitration generally, but there are no rules pertaining to the regulation of arbitration organizations."
The new law targets fee shifting, prohibiting an arbitrator from requiring a consumer to pay the fees and costs incurred by an opposing party if the consumer does not prevail in the arbitration.
In addition, any arbitration organization that is involved in more than 50 consumer arbitration cases per year would be required to collect and publish information regarding each consumer arbitration within the previous five years, according to the legislation.
The bill would also require an arbitration organization to waive the fees and costs of arbitration, exclusive of arbitrator fees, for an indigent consumer; and to provide written notice to any consumer of the right to obtain a fee waiver and to keep specified information concerning a consumer confidential.
Last Dec. 16, S-1490 was amended to clarify that "any position-holder in a non-profit organization who is not compensated for holding that position shall not be considered to have a financial interest in the organization."
The amended measure passed the Senate on Jan. 13 by a 28-12 vote. The Assembly approved the amended bill on concurrence on the same day by a vote of 71-3. The original Assembly bill, A-4972, sponsored by Assemblyman Paul Moriarty, D-Gloucester/Camden, passed that house last March.
"I think it's a fairness issue and it's important to protect consumers," Beach said inside the Senate chambers just before S-1490′s passage earlier this month. "Somebody needs to level the playing field since it is often the defendant company who chooses the arbitrator."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250