Law Professor Ordered to Pay $156K After Accepting Improper Referral Fee
A judge found accepting that fee was improper because New Jersey ethics rules only allow payment of referral fees by a certified trial attorney.
January 24, 2020 at 11:22 AM
4 minute read
A Philadelphia law professor is resisting efforts to collect a $156,436 judgment in New Jersey for receiving an improper referral fee and the unauthorized practice of law in a medical malpractice case.
Frank McClellan, professor emeritus at Temple University's Beasley School of Law, was ordered by Middlesex County Superior Court Judge Thomas McCloskey to pay that amount to Cindy Johnson, who consulted him about bringing a medical malpractice claim on behalf of her late husband. McClellan was also ordered on Jan. 3 to pay Johnson's legal bills for collection of the improper referral fees, an amount to be determined later. In addition, a separate legal malpractice claim brought by Johnson against McClellan is pending.
McClellan could be found in contempt of court after refusing to cooperate in a deposition tied to an effort to collect on the judgment. Johnson's lawyer sought to depose McClellan concerning his assets. The deposition notice instructed McClellan to bring statements for bank accounts, investments and other cash assets, as well as titles to any real property and automobiles.
But McClellan's counsel said his client would not attend the deposition because he intends to appeal. In response, Johnson's lawyer moved to find McClellan in contempt of court on Jan. 15.
McClellan received a $52,145 referral fee from Aaron Freiwald, a Philadelphia lawyer who represented Johnson in the medical malpractice case. But accepting that fee was improper because New Jersey ethics rules only allow payment of referral fees by a certified trial attorney, McCloskey ruled. Freiwald has not attained that status and was himself practicing pro hac vice in New Jersey. What's more, McCloskey found McClellan, who is not admitted in New Jersey, engaged in the unauthorized practice of law with his involvement in the Johnson case. On that basis, McCloskey found, the amount of the improper referral fee was subject to trebling.
McClellan is a founder of Temple's Center for Health Law Policy and Practice, and has taught courses on bioethics, medical malpractice, law and medicine, and torts. McClellan received his law degree from Duquesne University School of Law in 1970.
McClellan had an active role in Johnson's case, drafting documents, retaining experts and giving opinions about the law to Johnson and other attorneys working for her, McCloskey said. Fee-splitting is permitted under court rules, if the client is informed of the arrangement, and the split is proportionate to the amount of work performed by each attorney, which was not the case here, McCloskey said. But both McClellan and Freiwald characterized the payment as a referral fee, and not a split fee.
McClellan's referral fee was one-third of the $156,436 that Freiwald received after obtaining a $500,000 settlement in a medical malpractice suit on behalf of Johnson. When Johnson sought advice from McClellan about filing the suit, he referred her to Freiwald.
Johnson later determined that certain culpable parties were left out of the medical malpractice suit. She brought a malpractice suit against McClellan and Freiwald and others in Essex County. Freiwald assigned to Johnson the right to the return of the referral fee, according to a court document.
"Clearly, as established by the motion record, Mr. McClellan was interloping in the underlying medical malpractice matter and, as a consequence, was improperly compensated by Freiwald for doing so—without disclosure of the arrangement to the Plaintiff and her written consent to the same—to the detriment and loss to the Plaintiff's Estate," McCloskey said when he entered the judgment against McClellan.
Johnson is represented by William Gold of Bendit Weinstock in West Orange. Johnson is hoping her recovery from McClellan will help make up for a less-than-sufficient recovery in the medical malpractice suit, Gold said.
McClellan "doesn't understand the laws of New Jersey with respect to a medical malpractice case, doesn't understand he's practicing law in New Jersey and doesn't understand he was illegally, criminally practicing law in New Jersey, and doesn't understand he doesn't have the right to a fee," Gold said.
One attorney representing McClellan, John Slimm of Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin in Mount Laurel, declined to comment on the litigation. Another attorney, Christopher Carey of McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter in Newark, said he is not authorized to discuss the litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSeton Hall Escapes COVID-19 Wrongful Death Suit After Student Found Dead in Dorm
4 minute readWhere CFPB Enforcement Stops Short on Curbing School Lunch Fees, Class Action Complaint Steps Up
5 minute readFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250