Rear-End Accident Yields $1.05M Settlement in Monmouth County
A motorist who underwent neck and arm surgery for injuries he sustained when his vehicle was struck from behind was paid a $1.05 million settlement in…
January 24, 2020 at 09:00 AM
5 minute read
Robert Crum/Shutterstock.com
A motorist who underwent neck and arm surgery for injuries he sustained when his vehicle was struck from behind was paid a $1.05 million settlement in his Monmouth County suit, Ottaviano v. Donato, on Jan. 8.
Stefano Ottaviano, then 60, was stopped on Newman Springs Road in Shrewsbury on May 3, 2016, waiting to make a left turn onto Hance Avenue when his vehicle was rear-ended by a pickup truck operated by Anthony Donato and owned by Donato Contracting.
Ottaviano suffered orthopedic injuries to his neck and right elbow, requiring a two-level cervical fusion and right elbow surgery, said his lawyer, Norman Hobbie of Hobbie, Corrigan & DeCarlo in Eatontown. He filed suit against the company and Donato, who had borrowed the truck from a relative, Hobbie said. The driver admitted fault, saying he could not stop in time to avoid striking Ottaviano's vehicle, according to Hobbie.
The settlement of $1.05 million with Donato Contracting was reached on Dec. 18, 2019, after mediation with Thomas O'Brien. Payment was received on Jan. 8, Hobbie said.
Brian Brodowski of Zirulnik, Sherlock & DeMille in Hamilton, who represented the defendants, did not return a call about the case.
— Charles Toutant
$825,000 Bergen Auto Case
Thompson v. Galarraga: A motorist who claimed he sustained spinal injuries when he was struck by a mini-bus was paid a $825,000 settlement on Nov. 26 in his Bergen County suit.
According to counsel and court documents, on Jan. 7, 2016, plaintiff Marvin Thompson, then 52, was driving eastbound on Atlantic Avenue in Hackensack near the intersection with Railroad Avenue when he was struck by a mini-bus driven by Rigoberto Galarraga and owned by his employer, John Leckie Inc. of Hackensack, that was heading south on Railroad Avenue.
The suit claimed Galarraga failed to stop for a stop sign at the intersection. It named as a defendant Hackensack-based John Leckie Inc. The defendants denied the allegations and contended that Thompson acted negligently, according to court documents.
Thompson sustained a herniated disc, as well as three bulged discs, all at the cervical level, and after receiving pain injections and other treatment, underwent a C5-C6 discectomy and fusion with implantation of hardware, said his lawyer, Bertram Siegel of Siegel & Siegel in Teaneck.
Thompson missed six months of work from his job as a driver for a party rental company but returned to work after accumulating medical bills of approximately $300,000, Siegel said, noting that Thompson had only $15,000 in personal injury protection coverage.
A defense expert contended that Thompson's injuries resulted from a degenerative condition and not from the accident, Siegel said.
The parties settled during a session with Bergen County Superior Court Judge Robert Polifroni on Oct. 24, 2019. Court documents confirmed the $825,000 sum, which was paid on Nov. 26.
The defendants' counsel, Robert Pettoni of the Law Office of Gerald Strachan in Woodbridge, didn't respond to a call about the case.
— David Gialanella
No-Cause in Mercer UIM Case
Cataldi v. State Farm Insurance Co.: A Mercer County jury returned a defense verdict on Oct. 2, 2019, in an underinsured motorist suit resulting from a 2015 accident in Ewing.
According to counsel, on Dec. 11, 2015, plaintiff Elaine Cataldi, 57, was operating a pickup truck on Ewingville Road in Ewing. She came to a stop near the intersection with Heath Street and was rear-ended by a sedan. Cataldi claimed back injuries. Several days after the accident, Cataldi went to an emergency room; she complained of pain in her lower back. Cataldi was ultimately diagnosed with herniations at thoracic and lumbar intervertebral discs T11-12 and L4-5 and lumbar radiculopathy. Cataldi underwent chiropractic treatment, and a nerve root ablation and facet injections to her lumbar spine.
She sued her underinsured motorist carrier, State Farm Insurance Co., having settled with the tortfeasor's carrier for the liability policy limits of $15,000. Cataldi alleged she was entitled to underinsured motorist benefits from her $100,000 policy with State Farm.
The case proceeded to a trial on the issues of causation and damages. Cataldi's chiropractor and pain management physician causally related Cataldi's back injuries and treatment to the accident, and opined that she suffered permanent injuries. The defense questioned Cataldi's credibility, claiming she had prior disc bulges at L4-5 and L5-S1 and prior chronic lower back pain.
Following a three-day trial before Mercer County Superior Court Judge Robert Lougy, the seven-member jury on Oct. 2 unanimously rendered a defense verdict, finding that Cataldi did not suffer an injury from the accident.
James D. Blumenthal of Bennett, Bricklin & Saltzburg in Marlton represented State Farm. Anthony J. Vindigni of the law firm of Brandon J. Broderick represented Cataldi.
Editor's Comment: This report is based on information that was provided by defense counsel. Plaintiff's counsel did not respond to the reporter's phone calls.
— Adapted from VerdictSearch reports
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![The 'Substantial Certainty' of Employer Liability Policies The 'Substantial Certainty' of Employer Liability Policies](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/b8/0b/d1952f014e508ba5d5b58cdc2958/injuried-worker2-767x633.jpg)
!['A More Nuanced Issue': NJ Supreme Court Considers Appellate Rules for Personal Injury Judgments 'A More Nuanced Issue': NJ Supreme Court Considers Appellate Rules for Personal Injury Judgments](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/njlawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2024/01/Justices-Douglas-Fasciale-767x633.jpg)
'A More Nuanced Issue': NJ Supreme Court Considers Appellate Rules for Personal Injury Judgments
5 minute read![Appellate Division Rejects Third Circuit Interpretation of NJ Law, Says No Arbitration for Insurance Fraud Appellate Division Rejects Third Circuit Interpretation of NJ Law, Says No Arbitration for Insurance Fraud](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/njlawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2022/10/Fraud-Investigation-767x633.jpg)
Appellate Division Rejects Third Circuit Interpretation of NJ Law, Says No Arbitration for Insurance Fraud
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250