Increasing Regulation the Reason Top Lawyers Will Send More Work to Outside Counsel
Of all the general counsel and chief legal officers who plan on hiring more in-house attorneys, approximately 44% expect to increase the amount of work they send to law firms, according to the Association of Corporate Counsel's 2020 Chief Legal Officers Report.
January 28, 2020 at 10:49 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Even chief legal officers and general counsel who plan on hiring more in-house attorneys anticipate a significant amount of work will go to law firms because of the complex regulatory landscape, according to the Association of Corporate Counsel's 2020 Chief Legal Officers Survey published on Tuesday.
"In general, it is becoming a much more complex world," Susanna McDonald, the ACC's chief legal officer, said in an interview. "As the CLO of an organization, public or private, you are going to have to make strategic decisions based on the current challenges as well as your current mix of talent."
Of all the general counsel and chief legal officers who plan on hiring more in-house attorneys, approximately 44% expect to increase the amount of work they send to law firms. Thirty-three percent of general counsel and chief legal officers at private companies plan on increasing the amount of work they send to outside counsel.
Increasing regulation appears to be the reason more menial work is sent to law firms, so in-house counsel can work on more complicated tasks. Sixty-two percent of respondents expect the regulation relevant to their industry to increase in the next year. According to the report, 58% of respondents said their departments' expenditures increased because of regulatory compliance.
Speaking from experience, McDonald said that when she had to hire a deputy general counsel, she looked at the talent she already had in the legal department and put it up against the challenges the ACC faced in the future. She said at the time those challenges included complex regulatory demands surrounding cyber management and data security.
"I made sure I hired someone with a lot of experience in those areas," McDonald said. "That both helped reduce outsourcing and also freed up some dollars to spend on outsourcing when needed."
Regulation is becoming a more and more complex issue throughout all industries, McDonald said. One regulatory category affecting legal leaders across industries is cybersecurity and data privacy, especially with laws such as the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation and the California Consumer Privacy Act.
McDonald said board members are increasingly asking chief legal officers and general counsel about cybersecurity.
"That crosses industry. Everyone has a customer and all of that data has to be protected," McDonald said. "Everyone has employees, and all of that data has to be protected."
The data in the report is based on responses from 1,007 chief legal officers and general counsel spanning 20 industries and 47 countries.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeet the Judges: Senate Confirms 7 Superior Court Nominees in Final 2024 Session
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
- 2Biden commutes sentences for 37 of 40 federal death row inmates, including two convicted of California murders
- 3Avoiding Franchisor Failures: Be Cautious and Do Your Research
- 4De-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 1
- 5Alex Spiro Accuses Prosecutors of 'Unethical' Comments in Adams' Bribery Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250