The state Supreme Court heard arguments Monday on whether Pfizer provided a former employee sufficient language in an emailed document to require that she resolve all company issues through arbitration as opposed to litigation.

In Skuse v. Pfizer, the justices are considering whether to uphold the Appellate Division’s ruling from January 2019 that plaintiff Amy Skuse didn’t assent to the arbitration agreement with Pfizer because the term “acknowledge” next to the click box did not rise to the level of “agree.” The appeals panel ruled it simply wasn’t enough.