Senate Confirms 9 Superior Court Reappointments; 1 New Administrative Law Judge
The group on nominees passed through the Senate Judiciary Committee and the full Senate swiftly on Monday.
February 10, 2020 at 08:04 PM
4 minute read
The New Jersey Senate confirmed nine Superior Court judges for tenure Monday, and added a new administrative law judge.
A group motion vote by the Senate was made possible after Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Nicholas Scutari, D-Union, requested an emergency to add the judges to the board list so they could be voted on by the full Senate during its scheduled voting session that afternoon. The committee approved each of them earlier in the day.
The following judges were confirmed for tenure by the Senate by a 39-0 vote: Judge Mitzy Galis-Menendez of Hudson County; Judge Jeffrey R. Jablonski of Hudson County; Judge Angela White Dalton of Monmouth County; Judge Daniel Lindemann of Union County; Judge Stephen Taylor of Morris County; Judge James Wilson of Union County; Judge Marlene Lynch Ford of Ocean County; Judge Bradford M. Bury of Somerset County; and Judge Alan Lesnewich of Union County.
Joan M. Burke, who before the committee described becoming an administrative law judge as the "apex" of her legal career, beamed after she passed the committee vote. Burke previously worked in the Department of Law and Public Safety, Division of Consumer Affairs, where she's been since August 2014 as executive director of the Medical Practitioner Review Panel. Before that, she was at the Office of the Insurance Fraud Prosecutor as deputy attorney general from June 2004 to August 2014.
In her remarks to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Burke, who is also a registered nurse, reassured them she was ready for the new job.
"I want the chair to know that I have familiarized myself with the Bench Manual on Jury Selection and I am willing to accept electronic filings to include faxes," Burke said.
Dalton, of Howell, also told Scutari her office was accepting faxes as well.
"Senator, I want you to know that my staff have always been instructed to accept faxes, and indeed, our chambers is set up to ensure that everyone gets them on their computers," Dalton told the committee.
Like the others, she thanked her home senators, and the family court and assignment judges, for helping her through the first seven-year term.
"It has been the highest honor to serve the people of New Jersey for the past seven years as a Superior Court judge—something I dreamed of as a child and set as a goal," Dalton said.
Jablonski was just as appreciative of the last seven years. Jablonski gave a nod to how he and Scutari attended the same law school: Western Michigan University's Thomas M. Cooley Law School in Lansing, Michigan.
"True appreciation can only be demonstrated through action," Jablonski told the lawmakers. "Seven years ago, I promised this committee that I would reflect the characteristics that this committee demands of its judges: fairness, respect and patience. I feel I have committed myself to these laudable ideals and hope to continue serving the citizens of Hudson County and our state."
Ford, 65, of Seaside Park in Ocean County, was first nominated to the bench in 1992, where she served for 15 years. She left to become the Ocean County prosecutor from 2007 to 2013, and returned seven years ago to be the assignment judge in Ocean County.
"It's an honor and privilege." Ford said to the Law Journal prior to the Senate vote. "It's been quite an honor and an experience. Every day you have to remind yourself of the opportunity that the people of New Jersey gave you to serve them."
Just after 3 p.m., the Senate voted through all nine renominations to Superior Court and Burke's first-time nomination as administrative law judge.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Attorney General's Office Announces Major Shake-Up for Executive Leadership Team
4 minute read'Bewitched by the Technology': $300K to Settle Faulty Facial Recognition
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250