PNC Bank Hit With $2.4M Verdict Over Customer's Sexual Harassment of Employee
"All employers have an obligation to provide a safe workplace, no matter who does the harassing," said Nancy Erika Smith, counsel for the plaintiff.
February 11, 2020 at 12:24 PM
5 minute read
In a verdict demonstrating employers' potential exposure to sexual harassment claims based on the acts of clients or other nonemployees, a New Jersey jury has awarded $2.4 million to a former PNC Bank employee who said the company failed to protect her from unwelcome touching by a customer.
The Essex County Superior Court jury on Monday made the award to Damara Scott, an employee of the PNC Bank branch in Glen Ridge who claimed she was sexually assaulted in the vestibule outside the bank entrance in October 2013 by customer Patrick Pignatello, who has since died.
Scott's attorney, Nancy Erika Smith, said that the verdict should serve as a reminder that an employer's duty to protect its workers from harassment extends beyond the acts of company employees.
"All employers have an obligation to provide a safe workplace, no matter who does the harassing," Smith said.
Scott's suit claimed Pignatello, a customer who regularly visited the Glen Ridge branch in years past, pressed his crotch into her buttocks and rubbed against her during the 2013 incident. She also alleged he had a history of groping and harassing female employees and customers, and was occasionally—but only temporarily—banned from the premises.
PNC said it had no knowledge of such incidents.
The suit claimed the bans of Pignatello were temporary, and bank management refused to close Pignatello's accounts because he was an investor who could refer other business to the bank.
Following a three-week trial before Superior Court Judge Robert Gardner, the jury found that the alleged assault in fact occurred, that it constituted harassment on the basis of gender, and that PNC Bank should be found liable for the incident, according to court documents. The jury awarded $300,000 in past lost wages, $500,000 in future lost wages, $800,000 for past emotional distress, and $800,000 for future emotional distress, the documents noted.
Scott, whose title was wealth manager, reported the incident to police, who charged Pignatello, 77, with criminal sexual contact. He died a few weeks later from an apparent heart attack.
PNC Bank was represented by David Osterman of Goldberg Segalla's Princeton office, who deferred comment to PNC Bank.
A PNC Bank spokesman released a statement: "PNC does not condone harassment of any kind. We have a long-standing history of providing a safe workplace for our employees, and robust policies and procedures to help ensure that we continue to do so. We are disappointed by the verdict, even though the jury expressly found that this was not a case where punitive damages were appropriate. We intend to appeal based on errors made by the court."
Smith, of Smith Mullin in Montclair, was joined in representing Scott by Elizabeth attorney Randy Davenport.
Among Smith's prior representations is Fox News host Gretchen Carlson in a sexual harassment suit against Roger Ailes, the network's former chairman.
Pignatello's status as a customer was raised as a legal issue leading up to the trial.
PNC Bank had argued in a prior motion for summary judgment that the incident between Pignatello and Scott did not constitute a claim because he was not Scott's boss. In the motion, filed in March 2019, PNC Bank said the suit was "an attempt at a significant expansion of the protections afforded under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination." The incident was completely unforeseeable, did not occur in the workplace, and was entirely outside of PNC's control, the bank's motion said.
"This is critically important given that plaintiff's narrow path to a recovery in this case is through the LAD, which, by its very definition, is a workplace protection statute so that individuals are not subject to unwarranted advances or conduct, within the workplace, by individuals who have power over them within the workplace. Pignatello does not remotely fall into that category of individual," the bank said in its motion.
Superior Court Judge Bridget Stecher denied PNC's motion for summary judgment June 21, 2019.
Following the verdict, Smith said she was considering a postverdict motion for spoliation or fraudulent concealment against PNC Bank, based on an alleged failure to turn over video from the bank's security cameras of the 2013 incident between Pignatello and Scott. The bank provided no video from its own cameras in discovery, although a video from a nearby Panera restaurant was admitted into evidence, Smith said. PNC contended that the Panera video did not support Scott's claim about the incident with Pignatello, but the jury apparently did not agree, Smith added. PNC's spokesman said the company is unaware of any other video besides the one entered into evidence.
Trying the case was complicated by PNC's attempts to apply personal injury law to the case, rather than the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, which governs sexual harassment cases, Smith said, an issue that Scott's counsel addressed by focusing on an employer's duties to work to prevent such incidents.
PNC Bank had a sexual harassment training program in place a few months before the incident between Scott and Pignatello, but none of the employees in the Glen Ridge branch went through that training, and PNC never placed a sexual harassment policy into evidence in the case, according to Smith. A PNC spokesman said all current and former branch employees who testified said they received sexual harassment training annually.
Smith also presented testimony from an assistant branch manager who said another customer had his account closed by the bank after he used profanity toward a bank employee.
"The entire workplace is supposed to be safe, no matter who comes and goes," Smith said. "The only way employees are going to be safe is if the employer takes it seriously."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs AI-Generated Fraud Rises, Financial Companies Face a Long Cybersecurity Battle
Where CFPB Enforcement Stops Short on Curbing School Lunch Fees, Class Action Complaint Steps Up
5 minute readBank of America's Cash Sweep Program Attracts New Legal Fire in Class Action
3 minute readDOJ: TD Bank Agrees to Pay $3B Over Anti-Money Laundering Program Violations
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250