The Supreme Court is the “guardian” of New Jersey’s common law. Accordingly, it is the function of the court to fashion a tort law that comports with our social concepts of “basic fairness.” The courts have frequently stated that the imposition of “duty” invokes “a weighing of the relationship of the parties, the nature of the risk, and the public interest in the proposed solution.”

In Portee v. Jaffee, 84 N.J. 88 (1980), the Supreme Court created the tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED). The plaintiff, Renee Portee, witnessed the agonizing death of her seven-year old son, Guy, when he became trapped by an elevator door. The court held that a person who was not physically injured in an accident may recover damages for emotional distress caused by witnessing the injury of another, in the following circumstances:

  1. The death or serious physical injury of another;
  2. A marital or intimate familial relationship;
  3. Observation at the scene of the accident; and
  4. Severe emotional distress.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]