Delayed Diagnosis Claim Yields $1.19 Million Jury Award in Burlington
A Burlington County jury on Jan. 30 awarded a gross verdict of $1.7 million, reduced by 30% to $1.19 million based on a preexisting condition, in Wacker…
March 05, 2020 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
A Burlington County jury on Jan. 30 awarded a gross verdict of $1.7 million, reduced by 30% to $1.19 million based on a preexisting condition, in Wacker v. Magasiny, a medical malpractice suit claiming that an emergency room patient's delayed diagnosis led her to suffer permanent injuries.
On the morning of Sept. 14, 2014, Rebecca Wacker arrived at the emergency room at Virtua Memorial Hospital in Mount Holly with severe lower back pain and leg weakness, and she was evaluated and released. She returned a few hours later and was then diagnosed with cauda equina syndrome, which affects the base of the spine, her lawyer, Gary Ginsberg of Ginsberg & O'Connor in Cherry Hill, said. She underwent emergency surgery.
Wacker, currently 43, now has numbness in her feet, walks with a cane, wears a urine catheter around the clock, and has lost rectal function, Ginsberg said. Her suit claimed her condition worsened with several hours of delay in her diagnosis, and her husband, Corey Wacker, asserted a loss of consortium claim.
Ginsberg said that, during her first emergency room visit, Wacker was catheterized and produced a large amount of urine, which indicated that there was a serious issue requiring immediate attention.
The defendants generally contended that the diagnosis and result would have been no different had she underwent surgery in the morning, according to Ginsberg.
The suit named, among others, advanced practice nurse Jeffrey Magasiny of Emergency Physicians Associates, a contracted nurse who treated Wacker in the emergency room. According to Ginsberg, Magasiny said he wasn't aware that Wacker had produced a large amount of urine during her first visit to the emergency room.
After approximately three weeks of trial before Superior Court Judge Patricia Richmond, the jury by an 8-0 vote found that Magasiny deviated from the standard of care, and that Virtua Memorial Hospital held Magasiny out to be an agent of the hospital.
The jury, again unanimous, found no cause of action against a registered nurse employed by Virtua who treated Wacker, and no cause of action against an emergency room doctor who didn't treat Wacker but reviewed her chart.
The unanimous panel awarded $1.7 million for pain and suffering, and attributed the injury 70% to Magasiny and 30% to a preexisting condition, making net verdict $1.19 million.
The plaintiffs are seeking a new trial on the loss-of-consortium claim because the jury awarded no damages on that claim, and the defense is seeking a new trial claiming that the plaintiffs failed to show that the treatment delay increased the risk of harm, according to Ginsberg.
Carolyn Sleeper of Parker McCay in Mount Laurel, counsel to Virtua, confirmed the verdict, noting that Virtua is implicated in the verdict only by the jury's finding of apparent authority.
Magasiny's lawyer, Mark Petraske of Dughi Hewit & Domalewski in Cranford, didn't return a call about the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readSpoliation of Evidence Costs Defendants Nearly $850K in Sanction Award
4 minute readFatal Shooting of CEO Sets Off Scramble to Reassess Executive Security
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250