Delayed Diagnosis Claim Yields $1.19 Million Jury Award in Burlington
A Burlington County jury on Jan. 30 awarded a gross verdict of $1.7 million, reduced by 30% to $1.19 million based on a preexisting condition, in Wacker…
March 05, 2020 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
A Burlington County jury on Jan. 30 awarded a gross verdict of $1.7 million, reduced by 30% to $1.19 million based on a preexisting condition, in Wacker v. Magasiny, a medical malpractice suit claiming that an emergency room patient's delayed diagnosis led her to suffer permanent injuries.
On the morning of Sept. 14, 2014, Rebecca Wacker arrived at the emergency room at Virtua Memorial Hospital in Mount Holly with severe lower back pain and leg weakness, and she was evaluated and released. She returned a few hours later and was then diagnosed with cauda equina syndrome, which affects the base of the spine, her lawyer, Gary Ginsberg of Ginsberg & O'Connor in Cherry Hill, said. She underwent emergency surgery.
Wacker, currently 43, now has numbness in her feet, walks with a cane, wears a urine catheter around the clock, and has lost rectal function, Ginsberg said. Her suit claimed her condition worsened with several hours of delay in her diagnosis, and her husband, Corey Wacker, asserted a loss of consortium claim.
Ginsberg said that, during her first emergency room visit, Wacker was catheterized and produced a large amount of urine, which indicated that there was a serious issue requiring immediate attention.
The defendants generally contended that the diagnosis and result would have been no different had she underwent surgery in the morning, according to Ginsberg.
The suit named, among others, advanced practice nurse Jeffrey Magasiny of Emergency Physicians Associates, a contracted nurse who treated Wacker in the emergency room. According to Ginsberg, Magasiny said he wasn't aware that Wacker had produced a large amount of urine during her first visit to the emergency room.
After approximately three weeks of trial before Superior Court Judge Patricia Richmond, the jury by an 8-0 vote found that Magasiny deviated from the standard of care, and that Virtua Memorial Hospital held Magasiny out to be an agent of the hospital.
The jury, again unanimous, found no cause of action against a registered nurse employed by Virtua who treated Wacker, and no cause of action against an emergency room doctor who didn't treat Wacker but reviewed her chart.
The unanimous panel awarded $1.7 million for pain and suffering, and attributed the injury 70% to Magasiny and 30% to a preexisting condition, making net verdict $1.19 million.
The plaintiffs are seeking a new trial on the loss-of-consortium claim because the jury awarded no damages on that claim, and the defense is seeking a new trial claiming that the plaintiffs failed to show that the treatment delay increased the risk of harm, according to Ginsberg.
Carolyn Sleeper of Parker McCay in Mount Laurel, counsel to Virtua, confirmed the verdict, noting that Virtua is implicated in the verdict only by the jury's finding of apparent authority.
Magasiny's lawyer, Mark Petraske of Dughi Hewit & Domalewski in Cranford, didn't return a call about the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Supreme Court Clarifies Affidavit of Merit Requirement for Doctor With Dual Specialties
4 minute readArbitrators Under Fire for Allegedly Forcing Workers to 'Stay or Pay' Employers
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 2Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 3Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 4Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 5Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firm's Innovation Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250