Expansion of Public Defender Representation of Juveniles Gains Traction in Trenton
The lone abstention came from Assemblyman Erik Peterson, R-Hunterdon, a solo in Clinton and a municipal prosecutor, who said the bill in its current form needs to be tweaked.
March 05, 2020 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
A bill that would extend automatic eligibility for legal representation by the Office of Public Defender for defendants under 18 cleared the New Jersey Assembly Law and Public Safety Committee on Thursday.
Sponsors say the measure is intended to provide additional protections for the state's juveniles during criminal proceedings.
A-2396 passed the committee by a 7-0 vote with one abstention.
The lone abstention came from Assemblyman Erik Peterson, R-Hunterdon, who expressed concerns that the bill would provide parents of teens with means the same access to OPD representation as indigent defendants and others with fewer resources.
Under current law, persons under 21 are eligible for representation by a public defender upon the court's review of the financial resources of parents or guardians.
A-2396 would apply to any person under 18 arrested or charged with an indictable offense or act of delinquency. That person would automatically be eligible, at no expense to him or her, for representation by the OPD.
"These kids need someone to advocate for them, but affordability and the fear of what a lawyer might cost often leads them and their family to forgo legal representation. Eliminating the constraints to appointing counsel would ensure the constitutional right remains intact," said prime sponsor Assemblyman Benjie Wimberly, D-Bergen, in a statement after the committee vote in Trenton.
The Senate version, S-896, previously passed the Senate Law and Public Safety Committee by a vote of 4-0 on Feb. 24, according to legislative records. S-896 now awaits the Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee approval before heading to the Senate floor for a full vote there.
"Today, a juvenile's right to a public defender is not a guarantee," said one of the Senate bill's prime sponsors, Sen. Nellie Pou, D-Bergen, in a statement. "Instead it's dependent on their guardian, their guardian's finances and their guardian's willingness to apply for OPD services."
"But what if their guardian is involved in the incident, what if the guardian has skin in the game, what if they aren't looking out for the juvenile, but themselves?" Pou added. "When a young person is indicted, their fate should not be influenced by anything but their own actions."
The same release alluded to a National Juvenile Defender Center statistic that 11 states currently provide every child accused of an offense with an attorney, regardless of financial status. If the New Jersey bill becomes law, the Garden State would become the 12th state.
But Peterson, a solo in Clinton and a municipal prosecutor, said the bill in its current form needs to be tweaked to eliminate the provision where finances aren't a consideration.
"The Public Defender's Office has always been based on the ability to pay for legal counsel," Peterson said. "This bill says you can still can get a Public Defender regardless of your ability to pay, and that's a change.
"New Jersey is expensive enough, and to expand spending money on people who can afford an attorney seems a bit much," added Peterson, who is also the Republican assistant whip. "I'd rather see us use resources of the Public Defender's Office for someone who doesn't have the ability to pay for an attorney than on rich kids whose parents decide they'll take a public defender and save a few bucks."
A-2396 now goes to the Assembly Speaker for further review.
If signed by the governor, the bill would go into effect on the first day of the fourth month afterward.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRetiring AOC Director Judge Glenn A. Grant Walks Away From Judiciary 'Tremendously Impressed' by New Jersey's Judges
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Which Legal Tech Jobs Are on the Rise, and Which Aren't, with Jared Coseglia
- 2Absent Explicit Agreement, Court Rejects Unilateral Responsiveness Redaction of Text Messages
- 3SEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration
- 4Sidley Hires Paul Hastings Energy Finance Partner in Houston
- 5Potential Pitfalls in Arbitrating Religious Disputes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250