BAR REPORT - NJSBA members to vote on bylaws proposals this month
NJSBA members to vote on bylaws proposals
March 09, 2020 at 08:00 AM
7 minute read
A more inclusive governing body, advances in how we connect and communicate, and low attendance are reasons General Council should be dissolved, Board of Trustees proposes
The New Jersey State Bar Association's (NJSBA's) General Council traces its roots to 1930, when a group of attorneys organized a conference of county bar associations, which they hoped would help open the doors of the state organization to them. Soon, the group became an official part of the NJSBA —with a mission to bring issues to the organization—and it obtained a seat on the Association's Nominating Committee, earning it the power to influence the state bar group's leadership.
The official purpose was to serve as a forum for the county and affinity bar associations, as well as the NJSBA's sections and committees, and flag issues of concern that could impact the practice of law and the role of attorneys in society.
For many years, General Council did just that: selected people from its membership to serve on the Nominating Committee and brought issues from the larger legal community to the attention of the NJSBA for consideration and action. Another hallmark of General Council was an annual gathering where hundreds of its members got together to discuss the issues of the day.
But in recent years, participation in the group has waned. Fewer than 100 have attended the General Council's annual forum since 2011, with less than 50 attending in the last three years; only a fraction voted in elections to select members for the Nominating Committee; and it has been almost a decade since General Council presented a resolution about an issue for the NJSBA's consideration.
Now, after years of efforts to revive the group and extensive deliberation and discussion among the state's legal community, including county and affinity bar groups, and the NJSBA's Diversity Committee, the Board of Trustees has agreed it is time for a new approach.
Members of the NJSBA this month will be asked to vote on a proposed change to the bylaws that will preserve the spirit of General Council and the role its members played on the Nominating Committee, while recognizing that the practical value of the group has come to an end. Namely, the proposed bylaw amendments ensure the council's seats on the Nominating Committee continue to serve the constituencies as they did for General Council. In addition, members will be asked to vote on a proposal to change the deadline for the Board of Trustees to designate underrepresented groups, to allow for a more meaningful analysis.
"Upon recommendation of the General Council Executive Committee, and after consultation with county and affinity bar groups, as well as the NJSBA's Diversity Committee, the NJSBA Board of Trustees proposes amendments to the bylaws that would dissolve the General Council (GC). The proposal is made in recognition of a more inclusive NJSBA Board of Trustees, technological advances that make communication easier, and low participation in recent GC activities. Under the proposal, the size of the Nominating Committee remains the same, but the intent of the GC's role in the Nominating Committee makeup is maintained through the designation of GC's two seats for: a member from an underrepresented group and a general member of the NJSBA. In addition, to allow for more meaningful analysis each year, the time for designation of underrepresented groups by the Board of Trustees is extended to be consistent with the timeframe for other nomination and election policies," according to a statement from the Board of Trustees.
|A Concerted Effort
The General Council Executive Committee noticed that activity was declining several years ago and doubled down in its efforts to reinvigorate the group.
First, General Council held a town-hall style in-person meeting at the New Jersey Law Center. That, however, was largely attended by trustees following a board meeting held earlier in the day.
Then, General Council held meetings at two Annual Meeting and Conventions, scheduled during a time when there were no other competing programs. Those gatherings also received less than 50 attendees.
Last summer, the NJSBA made additional effort to engage General Council groups to appoint representatives. That resulted in the General Council's rolls swelling to nearly 800 members, and many had to be educated about what General Council did before assigning delegates. However, only a fraction participated in the fall election for a member to serve on the Nominating Committee.
|Changing Times
There are likely many factors that have contributed to declining participation in General Council. Key among them is that the NJSBA has transformed to be more responsive to the needs of the larger legal community.
Since General Council was first established, there have been numerous changes to the overall structure of the NJSBA that have resulted in a much broader and more diverse composition on both its Board of Trustees and its Nominating Committee.
The NJSBA board now includes a designated seat for every county, nine seats for section and committee representatives and eight seats for members of diverse backgrounds. All of the groups represented in General Council are now directly represented on the NJSBA board, allowing for direct input from all segments of the legal community on NJSBA decisions, as opposed to through General Council recommendations.
Likewise, the NJSBA's Nominating Committee now includes designated seats for county representation and at-large representation, allowing for direct input into the Nominating Committee process.
The NJSBA now regularly holds regional bar meetings with county and affinity bar associations, an annual roundtable with leaders of those groups and individual state bar nights with county bar associations. These gatherings seem to serve as the forum envisioned by General Council, allowing for the exchange of ideas and the discussion of issues directly among bar leaders. In addition, with technology advancements, expressing concerns or garnering support for developments in the legal community can occur quickly and easily through email, listservs and social media.
The majority of resolutions considered, most notably those relating to judicial appointments and funding for legal services, have been addressed by other means.
|The Path Ahead
The role of General Council today, was considered at the regional meetings with county and affinity bar leaders, with little reaction or comment.
After a lengthy analysis, the General Council Executive Committee concluded the group has outlived its meaningful purpose and should be eliminated given the current, more expansive NJSBA governance structure; technological advances that make coordination and communication easier; the low participation in General Council activities; and the considerable time, effort, resources and funds needed to administer the group.
The Diversity Committee also discussed the future of General Council and reported to the board, "the original objectives of the General Council are being met via other avenues…as it is currently operating, (it) has outlasted both its efficacy and purpose."
The Board of Trustees agreed.
Now it will be up to the NJSBA members to make the final determination. Members will vote this month on a bylaws proposal that dissolves General Council.
Notably, the proposed changes to the bylaws will retain the heart of the General Council's role in the Nominating Committee. General Council held an annual election where a member was selected to a seat on the Nominating Committee. The council had two seats on the committee.
Under the proposal, the size of the Nominating Committee will remain the same, and two seats, rather than one, will be held for a member from an underrepresented group, and three seats, rather than two, will be for general members of the NJSBA.
"General Council served an important purpose in our legal community for many years, but despite efforts to keep it vibrant, involvement has seriously declined. This proposal retains some of the critical elements of General Council. I urge our members to vote yes to approve this proposal," said NJSBA President Evelyn Padin.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.