Goal Line Nears for NJ Student-Athlete Fair Play Act
The measure was approved by the Assembly Higher Education Committee by a 4-2 vote and now goes before the full Assembly. If it passes the lower chamber, it heads to Gov. Phil Murphy's desk for signature.
March 09, 2020 at 09:00 AM
4 minute read
The New Jersey bill to allow student-athletes to earn compensation from the use of their name, image or likeness, and also obtain professional representation, including attorneys and agents, without impacting their scholarship eligibility, cleared another legislative hurdle and appears to be fast-tracked for passage.
A-2106, known as the New Jersey Fair Play Act, introduced Jan. 14, was approved by the Assembly Higher Education Committee by a 4-2 vote on March 5 and now goes before the full Assembly.
If it passes the lower chamber, it heads to Gov. Phil Murphy's desk for signature since the Senate version, S-971, passed on Feb. 10 by a 21-11 vote.
"Athletes are the faces of the industry. They are the ones out there on the field, putting in the work that will attract spectators and create opportunities for businesses to profit," Assemblywoman Lisa Swain, D-Bergen, a prime sponsor, said in a statement after the March 5 committee vote. "It's only fair that they have the right to earn compensation for their work."
Assemblyman Christopher Tully, D-Bergen, and Benjie Wimberly, D-Passaic, are also sponsors.
If signed by Murphy, New Jersey would become only the second state in the country to provide for compensation of collegiate student-athletes. Last September California signed into law similar legislation to compensate student-athletes and provide avenues for them to do so.
The New Jersey bill advances as the National Collegiate Athletic Association begins exploring plans to allow student-athletes to earn money from their name in some capacity. While the association currently bars any such compensation, last year it announced it would adopt a policy allowing college athletes to financially benefit from their name, image and likeness within two years. Stacey Osburn, director of communications for the NCAA, told the Law Journal in a recent email that the NCAA's Board of Governors in October 2019 voted unanimously to permit students participating in athletics the opportunity to benefit from the use of their name, image and likeness in a manner consistent with the collegiate model. All three NCAA divisions were directed to immediately consider modernization of bylaws and policies, with each division to create any new rules beginning immediately, but no later than January 2021, Osburn said.
The New Jersey measure states: "The bill provides that a student-athlete who enters into a contract providing compensation to the student-athlete for use of his name, image, or likeness must disclose the contract to an official of the four-year institution of higher education, to be designated by the institution."
It adds: "An institutional team contract may not prevent a student-athlete from using the athlete's name, image, or likeness for a commercial purpose when the athlete is not engaged in official team activities."
But there are limits under the bill. Student-athletes would not be able to earn compensation when their image is used in connection with certain industries: adult entertainment, alcohol, gambling of any kind, including sports betting, lottery, or betting connected to video games, online games, and mobile devices, tobacco and electronic smoking, pharmaceuticals, controlled dangerous substances or firearms.
"Every day, student athletes generate massive amounts of value for their schools, leagues, the NCAA, and their for-profit partners. But the group that works and sacrifices the most to generate that value—the student athletes themselves—do not see a single penny," Tully said in a statement after the committee vote. "The New Jersey Fair Play Act finally corrects the fundamental imbalances that have existed in collegiate athletics for far too long."
Added Wimberly: "For all of their hard work, these students deserve a piece of the pie. It should also be allowable for them to be fairly compensated."
Sponsors of the Senate bill are Sen. Joseph Lagana, D-Bergen, Sen. Sandra Cunningham, D-Hudson, and Senate Majority Leader Loretta Weinberg, D-Bergen.
Under the measure, a four-year institution would be prohibited from joining the NCAA or any athletic association, conference, or other group or organization with control over intercollegiate athletics, if it prohibited college athletes from earning compensation from their name, image or likeness; prevented a student-athlete from obtaining professional representation in relation to contracts or legal matters; or interfered with compensation reaching a student-athlete.
In turn, a student-athlete earning compensation would be required to disclose the contract to a college official.
If signed by Murphy, the bill would take effect immediately and first be applicable in the fifth academic year following enactment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Justices Provide A Sensible Decision on the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act
4 minute read2024 Continuing Legal Education Attorney Ineligible List and In-House Counsel Ineligible List
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250